Voting Agreement between Clearworks Integration Services, Inc., United Computing Group, Inc., United Consulting Group, Inc. and Kevan Casey regarding sale of outstanding common stock dated December 30, 1999. 5 pages.
Nebraska Voting Agreement — Sale of Outstanding Common Stock In the state of Nebraska, a voting agreement has been established between Clear works Integration Services, United Computing Group, United Consulting Group, and Kevin Casey. This agreement aims to regulate the sale of outstanding common stock between the involved parties. The Nebraska voting agreement ensures that all parties involved can effectively collaborate and exercise their rights and responsibilities regarding the sale of outstanding common stock. It provides a transparent framework for decision-making, voting rights, and other essential aspects related to the sale. The agreement serves as a legal document that outlines the terms and conditions under which the sale of outstanding common stock will take place. It includes provisions such as the method of executing the stock sale, the role of each party, and the distribution of proceeds after the sale. Different types of Nebraska Voting Agreements between Clear works Integration Services, United Computing Group, United Consulting Group, and Kevin Casey may include: 1. Majority Rule Voting Agreement: This type of agreement states that a certain majority of votes is required to make decisions regarding the sale of outstanding common stock. Typically, a specific percentage, such as two-thirds or three-fourths, is set as the threshold for approving any proposal. 2. Unanimous Voting Agreement: Under this type of agreement, all parties involved must unanimously agree before making any decisions related to the sale of outstanding common stock. This ensures that every party has an equal say and prevents any unilateral actions. 3. Proportional Voting Agreement: In this agreement, the voting power of each party is proportional to their respective ownership of the outstanding common stock. The voting power is determined by the number of shares each party holds, ensuring fair representation and decision-making. 4. Temporal Voting Agreement: This agreement might have a specified time duration during which the voting rights are in effect. It may be applicable only for a particular period, such as during the sale process or until the completion of the stock transfer. These various types of Nebraska Voting Agreements provide flexible options for the involved parties and cater to their specific needs and requirements. They ensure that the sale of outstanding common stock is conducted in a fair and transparent manner, promoting effective collaboration and decision-making among Clear works Integration Services, United Computing Group, United Consulting Group, and Kevin Casey.
Nebraska Voting Agreement — Sale of Outstanding Common Stock In the state of Nebraska, a voting agreement has been established between Clear works Integration Services, United Computing Group, United Consulting Group, and Kevin Casey. This agreement aims to regulate the sale of outstanding common stock between the involved parties. The Nebraska voting agreement ensures that all parties involved can effectively collaborate and exercise their rights and responsibilities regarding the sale of outstanding common stock. It provides a transparent framework for decision-making, voting rights, and other essential aspects related to the sale. The agreement serves as a legal document that outlines the terms and conditions under which the sale of outstanding common stock will take place. It includes provisions such as the method of executing the stock sale, the role of each party, and the distribution of proceeds after the sale. Different types of Nebraska Voting Agreements between Clear works Integration Services, United Computing Group, United Consulting Group, and Kevin Casey may include: 1. Majority Rule Voting Agreement: This type of agreement states that a certain majority of votes is required to make decisions regarding the sale of outstanding common stock. Typically, a specific percentage, such as two-thirds or three-fourths, is set as the threshold for approving any proposal. 2. Unanimous Voting Agreement: Under this type of agreement, all parties involved must unanimously agree before making any decisions related to the sale of outstanding common stock. This ensures that every party has an equal say and prevents any unilateral actions. 3. Proportional Voting Agreement: In this agreement, the voting power of each party is proportional to their respective ownership of the outstanding common stock. The voting power is determined by the number of shares each party holds, ensuring fair representation and decision-making. 4. Temporal Voting Agreement: This agreement might have a specified time duration during which the voting rights are in effect. It may be applicable only for a particular period, such as during the sale process or until the completion of the stock transfer. These various types of Nebraska Voting Agreements provide flexible options for the involved parties and cater to their specific needs and requirements. They ensure that the sale of outstanding common stock is conducted in a fair and transparent manner, promoting effective collaboration and decision-making among Clear works Integration Services, United Computing Group, United Consulting Group, and Kevin Casey.