New Hampshire Motion for Acquittal Based on Insanity is a legal procedure used in criminal cases where the defendant claims they were not legally responsible for their actions due to mental illness or insanity. This motion can be filed by the defense attorney to request the court to dismiss the charges against the accused based on their lack of criminal intent or capacity. In New Hampshire, there are primarily two types of motions for acquittal based on insanity that can be used in different situations: 1. GRI (Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity): This motion is filed when the defense aims to prove that the accused did commit the act but was not criminally responsible for their actions due to a mental illness or defect. The defense will present expert witnesses, psychiatric evaluations, and other evidence to support their claim that the defendant lacked the mental capacity to understand the nature and consequences of their actions. 2. Incompetency to Stand Trial: This motion is filed when the defense asserts that the accused is currently incompetent to stand trial due to mental illness, making it impossible for them to understand the charges against them or assist adequately in their defense. The main goal is to temporarily suspend the trial proceedings until the defendant's mental competency improves through treatment and evaluation. When accepting a motion for acquittal based on insanity, the court will carefully evaluate the evidence presented by both the defense and the prosecution. The judge will consider factors such as the defendant's mental state at the time of the offense, expert testimonies, past medical records, and the opinions of mental health professionals. Ultimately, the court will determine whether the defendant meets the legal standards defined by New Hampshire law to be considered not guilty by reason of insanity or incompetent to stand trial. It is important to note that each case of acquittal based on insanity is unique and highly dependent on the specific details and circumstances of the crime as well as the defendant's mental health history. The decision to grant the motion lies with the judge, who must weigh the evidence to ensure justice is served while protecting the rights and due process of the accused.