If a question of paternity of a child is raised, the parties have a right to submit that question to a jury for determination. Therefore, the issue is whether or not defendant is the father of this child. The question of the amount of support for the child or the mother is not for the jury's consideration.
In a New Hampshire paternity case, it is important to understand that the instruction to the jury will clearly state that the determination of the amount of support is not within their purview. The jury's role is to assess the evidence presented and make a determination regarding the establishment of paternity. The New Hampshire instruction guides the jury specifically on matters pertaining to the proof of paternity, which involves examining testimonies, genetic testing results, or any other conclusive evidence presented during the trial. The instruction ensures that the jury does not become preoccupied with the financial aspects, allowing them to focus solely on establishing the biological relationship between the alleged father and the child. It is essential to note that New Hampshire employs general jury instructions in paternity cases, which broadly address the jury's role and responsibilities. However, there may not be uniquely separate instructions explicitly stating that the amount of support is not a question for the jury, as the principle is generally understood and incorporated into the current set of instructions. The absence of a specific instruction on the amount of support is not a question for the jury is justified by legal considerations. Determining the financial obligations and support payments involves complex calculations and considerations based on state laws, guidelines, and the specific circumstances of the case. Thus, it is typically left to the discretion of the judge, who has expertise in family law and possesses the necessary knowledge to calculate support amounts. In paternity cases, the judge will typically use established legal procedures and guidelines to determine child support. These guidelines take into account various factors such as the income of both parents, financial obligations, and the child's needs. The judge's decision encompasses not only the financial aspects but also ensures that the child's best interests are prioritized. While the instruction to the jury does not encompass different variations or types, it is worth mentioning that the judge may provide additional instructions relevant to the specific circumstances of a case. These instructions are designed to guide the jury in making fair and unbiased determinations regarding paternity, with the primary objective of safeguarding the child's welfare and establishing the truth regarding parental relationships. In conclusion, the New Hampshire instruction to the jury in paternity cases clearly emphasizes that the amount of support is not a question for the jury. By focusing on establishing paternity, the jury can concentrate on the core objective of determining the biological relationship between the alleged father and the child. The responsibility of establishing child support falls under the jurisdiction of the judge, who takes into consideration the relevant laws, guidelines, and circumstances to ensure fair and appropriate support obligations.In a New Hampshire paternity case, it is important to understand that the instruction to the jury will clearly state that the determination of the amount of support is not within their purview. The jury's role is to assess the evidence presented and make a determination regarding the establishment of paternity. The New Hampshire instruction guides the jury specifically on matters pertaining to the proof of paternity, which involves examining testimonies, genetic testing results, or any other conclusive evidence presented during the trial. The instruction ensures that the jury does not become preoccupied with the financial aspects, allowing them to focus solely on establishing the biological relationship between the alleged father and the child. It is essential to note that New Hampshire employs general jury instructions in paternity cases, which broadly address the jury's role and responsibilities. However, there may not be uniquely separate instructions explicitly stating that the amount of support is not a question for the jury, as the principle is generally understood and incorporated into the current set of instructions. The absence of a specific instruction on the amount of support is not a question for the jury is justified by legal considerations. Determining the financial obligations and support payments involves complex calculations and considerations based on state laws, guidelines, and the specific circumstances of the case. Thus, it is typically left to the discretion of the judge, who has expertise in family law and possesses the necessary knowledge to calculate support amounts. In paternity cases, the judge will typically use established legal procedures and guidelines to determine child support. These guidelines take into account various factors such as the income of both parents, financial obligations, and the child's needs. The judge's decision encompasses not only the financial aspects but also ensures that the child's best interests are prioritized. While the instruction to the jury does not encompass different variations or types, it is worth mentioning that the judge may provide additional instructions relevant to the specific circumstances of a case. These instructions are designed to guide the jury in making fair and unbiased determinations regarding paternity, with the primary objective of safeguarding the child's welfare and establishing the truth regarding parental relationships. In conclusion, the New Hampshire instruction to the jury in paternity cases clearly emphasizes that the amount of support is not a question for the jury. By focusing on establishing paternity, the jury can concentrate on the core objective of determining the biological relationship between the alleged father and the child. The responsibility of establishing child support falls under the jurisdiction of the judge, who takes into consideration the relevant laws, guidelines, and circumstances to ensure fair and appropriate support obligations.
