New Hampshire Jury Instruction — 1.1 Comparative Negligence Defense is a legal guideline given to jurors during a trial in New Hampshire. This instruction provides valuable information regarding the concept of comparative negligence and its application in determining liability and damages in a personal injury case. Understanding this instruction is crucial for jurors in rendering a fair and just verdict. Keywords: New Hampshire, jury instruction, 1.1, comparative negligence defense, liability, damages, personal injury case, verdict. The comparative negligence defense instruction aims to clarify the principles and standards that apply when multiple parties share fault for an incident leading to personal injury. It educates jurors on how to consider the actions of all parties involved and apportion the degree of fault and responsibility to each party. This instruction ensures that the injured party receives appropriate compensation based on their contributory negligence while accounting for the negligence of the other parties. New Hampshire Jury Instruction — 1.1 Comparative Negligence Defense outlines different types of comparative negligence doctrines recognized within the state's legal framework. These may include: 1. Pure Comparative Negligence: This type of comparative negligence doctrine allows for the injured party to collect compensation for damages even if they were primarily at fault. The damages awarded are reduced by the percentage of their negligence. 2. Modified Comparative Negligence (50% rule): Under this doctrine, the injured party can only recover damages if their degree of fault is equal to or less than 50%. If their negligence exceeds 50%, they are barred from recovering any compensation. 3. Modified Comparative Negligence (51% rule): Similar to the above doctrine, the injured party is only eligible to recover damages if their fault is less than or equal to 50%. However, if their degree of fault surpasses 50%, they are completely barred from receiving any compensation. The New Hampshire Jury Instruction — 1.1 Comparative Negligence Defense provides jurors with the necessary guidance to analyze evidence and assess the percentages of fault assigned to each party involved. It emphasizes the importance of considering all relevant factors, such as the actions, knowledge, and behavior of the parties leading up to the incident, to determine the appropriate degree of responsibility and damages to be awarded. In conclusion, New Hampshire Jury Instruction — 1.1 Comparative Negligence Defense is a comprehensive guideline that ensures jurors understand the concept of comparative negligence and its various types within the state's legal system. By implementing these instructions, jurors can make informed decisions and provide a fair and just verdict in personal injury cases while holding all relevant parties accountable for their actions or inaction.