New Hampshire Jury Instruction - 2.2 With Comparative Negligence Defense

• Category: Federal - Jury Instructions
• State: Multi-State
• Control #: US-11C-0-2-2
• Format: Word; Rich Text

Description

This form contains sample jury instructions, to be used across the United States. These questions are to be used only as a model, and should be altered to more perfectly fit your own cause of action needs. New Hampshire Jury Instruction — 2.2 With Comparative Negligence Defense is a legal guideline provided to jurors in New Hampshire during civil trials that involve cases of comparative negligence. This instruction assists the jury in understanding and applying the concept of comparative negligence as a defense in determining liability and damages. Comparative negligence is a legal principle that enables the allocation of fault between parties involved in a civil case. New Hampshire follows the doctrine of modified comparative negligence, specifically the 51% rule. Under this rule, a plaintiff can recover damages if their negligence does not exceed 50% responsibility for the accident or incident. The New Hampshire Jury Instruction — 2.2 With Comparative Negligence Defense covers different aspects and elements of the comparative negligence defense in order to provide clear instructions to the jury members. These instructions may vary slightly depending on the specific circumstances of the case. Some types or subcategories of this instruction may include: 1. Assumption of risk: This instruction informs the jury about the concept of assumption of risk, which may reduce or eliminate the defendant's liability if the plaintiff voluntarily assumed the risks associated with the alleged negligent act. 2. Proportional liability: This instruction explains how the jury should assess and apportion the percentage of fault to each party involved in the incident. The jury must determine the extent to which the plaintiff and defendant(s) contributed to the harm or damages suffered. 3. Evaluation of evidence: This instruction guides the jury on how to assess the evidence presented in court, including testimonies, expert opinions, and any relevant documentation. Jurors must evaluate the evidence to determine the comparative negligence of the parties involved. 4. Jury instructions regarding comparative negligence elements: This instruction thoroughly explains the legal elements related to comparative negligence, such as duty of care, breach of duty, causation, and damages. It provides a comprehensive understanding of the entire defense framework. Overall, New Hampshire Jury Instruction — 2.2 With Comparative Negligence Defense plays a vital role in ensuring fair and just verdicts in cases involving comparative negligence. It aids the jury in appropriately analyzing evidence, deliberating on fault allocation, and determining the appropriate amount of damages based on the shared responsibility between the plaintiff and defendant(s).

New Hampshire Jury Instruction — 2.2 With Comparative Negligence Defense is a legal guideline provided to jurors in New Hampshire during civil trials that involve cases of comparative negligence. This instruction assists the jury in understanding and applying the concept of comparative negligence as a defense in determining liability and damages. Comparative negligence is a legal principle that enables the allocation of fault between parties involved in a civil case. New Hampshire follows the doctrine of modified comparative negligence, specifically the 51% rule. Under this rule, a plaintiff can recover damages if their negligence does not exceed 50% responsibility for the accident or incident. The New Hampshire Jury Instruction — 2.2 With Comparative Negligence Defense covers different aspects and elements of the comparative negligence defense in order to provide clear instructions to the jury members. These instructions may vary slightly depending on the specific circumstances of the case. Some types or subcategories of this instruction may include: 1. Assumption of risk: This instruction informs the jury about the concept of assumption of risk, which may reduce or eliminate the defendant's liability if the plaintiff voluntarily assumed the risks associated with the alleged negligent act. 2. Proportional liability: This instruction explains how the jury should assess and apportion the percentage of fault to each party involved in the incident. The jury must determine the extent to which the plaintiff and defendant(s) contributed to the harm or damages suffered. 3. Evaluation of evidence: This instruction guides the jury on how to assess the evidence presented in court, including testimonies, expert opinions, and any relevant documentation. Jurors must evaluate the evidence to determine the comparative negligence of the parties involved. 4. Jury instructions regarding comparative negligence elements: This instruction thoroughly explains the legal elements related to comparative negligence, such as duty of care, breach of duty, causation, and damages. It provides a comprehensive understanding of the entire defense framework. Overall, New Hampshire Jury Instruction — 2.2 With Comparative Negligence Defense plays a vital role in ensuring fair and just verdicts in cases involving comparative negligence. It aids the jury in appropriately analyzing evidence, deliberating on fault allocation, and determining the appropriate amount of damages based on the shared responsibility between the plaintiff and defendant(s).