New Hampshire Jury Instruction - 6.6.1 General Instruction - Comparative Negligence Defense

• Category: Federal - Jury Instructions
• State: Multi-State
• Control #: US-11CF-6-6-1
• Format: Word; Rich Text

Description

This form contains sample jury instructions, to be used across the United States. These questions are to be used only as a model, and should be altered to more perfectly fit your own cause of action needs. New Hampshire Jury Instruction — 6.6.1 GeneraInstructionio— - Comparative Negligence Defense is a legal guideline provided to juries in New Hampshire during civil trials. This instruction explains the concept of comparative negligence as a potential defense raised by the defendant in a personal injury lawsuit. A key objective of this instruction is to help the jurors understand the legal principles and standards surrounding comparative negligence. Keywords: New Hampshire, jury instruction, 6.6.1, general instruction, comparative negligence defense Different types of New Hampshire Jury Instruction — 6.6.1 GeneraInstructionio— - Comparative Negligence Defense may include: 1. Basic Comparative Negligence Defense: This type of instruction outlines the basic framework of comparative negligence, emphasizing that both the plaintiff and the defendant can be assigned a degree of fault for the injury under consideration. It guides the jury on assessing and comparing the relative negligence of all parties involved. 2. Modified Comparative Negligence Defense: This instruction variant may introduce a modified approach to comparative negligence. It typically explains that a plaintiff can only recover damages if their negligence is not greater than the combined negligence of the defendant(s) involved. In certain cases, a jurisdiction-specific percentage threshold might be provided for the jury's consideration. 3. Pure Comparative Negligence Defense: In states that recognize a pure comparative negligence standard, this instruction informs the jury that a plaintiff's degree of negligence will not bar recovery altogether. Instead, any award granted would be reduced by the percentage of fault attributed to the plaintiff. 4. Gross Negligence Bar: This type of instruction may be presented in cases where the defendant's negligence exceeds the threshold of ordinary negligence. It clarifies that if the jury finds the defendant's conduct to be grossly negligent, comparative negligence does not apply, and the plaintiff may be entitled to full damages. 5. Comparative Negligence Threshold: Some jurisdictions may have a statutory threshold for comparative negligence, beyond which the plaintiff is barred from recovering any damages. This instruction clarifies the threshold percentage and guides the jury's evaluation accordingly. Overall, New Hampshire Jury Instruction — 6.6.1 GeneraInstructionio— - Comparative Negligence Defense provides crucial guidance to the jury regarding the principles and elements of comparative negligence and its potential implications for the case at hand. It ensures the jury is well-informed and able to apply the appropriate legal standards in determining liability and potential damages.

New Hampshire Jury Instruction — 6.6.1 GeneraInstructionio— - Comparative Negligence Defense is a legal guideline provided to juries in New Hampshire during civil trials. This instruction explains the concept of comparative negligence as a potential defense raised by the defendant in a personal injury lawsuit. A key objective of this instruction is to help the jurors understand the legal principles and standards surrounding comparative negligence. Keywords: New Hampshire, jury instruction, 6.6.1, general instruction, comparative negligence defense Different types of New Hampshire Jury Instruction — 6.6.1 GeneraInstructionio— - Comparative Negligence Defense may include: 1. Basic Comparative Negligence Defense: This type of instruction outlines the basic framework of comparative negligence, emphasizing that both the plaintiff and the defendant can be assigned a degree of fault for the injury under consideration. It guides the jury on assessing and comparing the relative negligence of all parties involved. 2. Modified Comparative Negligence Defense: This instruction variant may introduce a modified approach to comparative negligence. It typically explains that a plaintiff can only recover damages if their negligence is not greater than the combined negligence of the defendant(s) involved. In certain cases, a jurisdiction-specific percentage threshold might be provided for the jury's consideration. 3. Pure Comparative Negligence Defense: In states that recognize a pure comparative negligence standard, this instruction informs the jury that a plaintiff's degree of negligence will not bar recovery altogether. Instead, any award granted would be reduced by the percentage of fault attributed to the plaintiff. 4. Gross Negligence Bar: This type of instruction may be presented in cases where the defendant's negligence exceeds the threshold of ordinary negligence. It clarifies that if the jury finds the defendant's conduct to be grossly negligent, comparative negligence does not apply, and the plaintiff may be entitled to full damages. 5. Comparative Negligence Threshold: Some jurisdictions may have a statutory threshold for comparative negligence, beyond which the plaintiff is barred from recovering any damages. This instruction clarifies the threshold percentage and guides the jury's evaluation accordingly. Overall, New Hampshire Jury Instruction — 6.6.1 GeneraInstructionio— - Comparative Negligence Defense provides crucial guidance to the jury regarding the principles and elements of comparative negligence and its potential implications for the case at hand. It ensures the jury is well-informed and able to apply the appropriate legal standards in determining liability and potential damages.