New Hampshire Jury Instruction — Personal Injury provides guidelines and directions to juries in personal injury cases within the state of New Hampshire. These instructions assist jurors in understanding the legal principles and standards of proof they should consider when deliberating on personal injury claims. Here are some key terms and types of New Hampshire Jury Instruction — Personal Injury: 1. Negligence: This category of instructions helps the jury understand the concept of negligence, which refers to the failure of a party to exercise reasonable care, resulting in harm to another person. 2. Standard of Care: These instructions explain the level of care expected from a person, professional, or business in a particular situation, based on the circumstances and relevant laws. Jurors are guided in determining if the defendant breached their duty of care. 3. Causation: Instructions related to causation outline the requirement for the plaintiff to establish a direct link between the defendant's negligence and the injuries suffered. They help jurors evaluate whether the defendant's actions were a substantial factor in causing harm to the plaintiff. 4. Comparative Fault: New Hampshire follows a comparative fault system, which means that if the plaintiff is partially responsible for their injuries, their recoverable damages may be reduced. Instructions covering comparative fault guide jurors in allocating fault percentages among the parties involved. 5. Damages: Instructions on damages inform jurors about the types of compensation available to the injured party. They encompass instructions related to economic damages (such as medical expenses, lost wages, and property damage) and non-economic damages (such as pain and suffering, emotional distress, and loss of enjoyment of life). 6. Res IPSA Sequitur: This Latin term translates to "the thing speaks for itself" and refers to a legal doctrine that allows a fact finder (jury) to infer negligence based on the very nature of the accident or injury. Instructions regarding res IPSA sequitur may be given if the circumstances of the case warrant it. 7. Defenses: Instructions related to defenses help jurors understand potential arguments raised by defendants, such as assumption of risk, contributory negligence, or lack of causation, which may absolve them from liability. It is worth noting that the specific instructions and categories may vary based on the facts and circumstances of each individual case.