New Jersey Jury Instruction — 2.2.3.1 Convicted Prisoner Alleging Excessive Force provides guidance to jurors in cases where a convicted prisoner alleges that excessive force was used against them. This instruction aims to ensure a fair and impartial evaluation of the evidence presented and helps determine whether the convicted prisoner's constitutional rights were violated. Keywords: New Jersey jury instruction, excessive force, convicted prisoner, constitutional rights, fair evaluation, impartial, evidence, alleged. Different types of New Jersey Jury Instruction — 2.2.3.1 Convicted Prisoner Alleging Excessive Force may include: 1. Use of Excessive Force by Correctional Officers: This instruction focuses on cases where convicted prisoners claim that correctional officers used excessive force against them while carrying out their duties within the prison facility or during transportation. 2. Excessive Force during Arrest or Detention: This instruction addresses situations where excessive force is alleged to have been used by law enforcement officers during an arrest or while the convicted prisoner was under police custody or detention, before their conviction. 3. Alleged Excessive Force during Incarceration: This instruction deals with cases in which convicted prisoners claim that excessive force was used by prison staff, including correctional officers, while they were serving their sentence. 4. Excessive Force Resulting in Injury or Death: This instruction specifically focuses on cases where excessive force allegedly caused severe physical injury or death to the convicted prisoner, requiring a heightened level of scrutiny from the jurors. 5. Federal Constitutional Violations: This instruction may be used in cases involving alleged violations of the convicted prisoner's rights under the United States Constitution, such as the Eighth Amendment's prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment. Each type of instruction provides specific guidance to the jury to ensure a fair assessment of the evidence presented and a proper evaluation of the convicted prisoner's claim of excessive force.