New Jersey Jury Instruction — Aiding AnAbettingin— - Agency - 18 USC Sect. 2 is a set of guidelines provided to a jury during a trial involving a criminal offense where a person is accused of aiding and abetting another person in the commission of a crime, specifically under section 2 of Title 18 in the United States Code (USC). Under this instruction, the jury is informed about the legal principles and requirements related to aiding and abetting, focusing specifically on the concept of agency. It explains how one can be held criminally liable for aiding and abetting the commission of a crime by another person if they act as an agent of that person. Various types of New Jersey Jury Instruction — Aiding AnAbettingin— - Agency - 18 USC Sect. 2 may exist depending on the specific details of the case. Some possible variations could include: 1. Aiding and Abetting — Agency in Violation of Specific Criminal Statute: This instruction would be applicable when the aiding and abetting occurred in relation to a particular crime defined by a specific criminal statute, such as drug trafficking, bank fraud, or conspiracy. 2. Aiding and Abetting — Agency in Violation of Federal Law: This instruction would apply when the crime in question is a violation of federal law and has been charged as such, falling under the jurisdiction of the United States federal courts. 3. Aiding and Abetting — Agency in Violation of State Law: This instruction variation is relevant when the crime being aided and abetted is a violation of state law, subjecting the case to be tried in the New Jersey state courts. Each instruction typically explains the essential elements that the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt in a conviction under the aiding and abetting theory of agency. It may include elements such as: 1. The principal person committed the crime alleged. 2. The defendant intentionally aided, counseled, or encouraged the principal person in the commission of the crime. 3. The defendant acted as an agent or representative of the principal person. 4. The defendant's assistance knew and voluntary. 5. The defendant's actions contributed to the commission of the crime. 6. The defendant had knowledge of the principal person's unlawful purpose. These instructions ensure that the jury understands the legal standards and requirements necessary to determine whether the defendant can be held liable under the theory of aiding and abetting through agency. They help guide the jury's decision-making process and assist them in reaching a fair and just verdict based on the evidence presented during the trial.