A Motion for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict (NOV) or, in the Alternative, for a New Trial in New Jersey may be filed when prejudicial statements are made during a trial. This legal motion aims to challenge the fairness of the trial outcome based on the introduction of such statements. There are a few different types of motions that can be used in this scenario, including: 1. Motion for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict: This motion seeks a judgment in favor of the moving party, notwithstanding the jury's verdict. It asserts that there was insufficient evidence to support the jury's decision but does not directly address prejudicial statements. 2. Motion for a New Trial: This motion requests a new trial due to various reasons, including errors during the trial proceedings. When prejudicial statements are made, this motion can be utilized as a means to argue that these statements improperly influenced the jury's decision, thereby rendering the trial unfair. 3. Motion for a New Trial Based on Prejudicial Statements: In the context of prejudicial statements, a specific motion can be filed specifically highlighting the impact of these statements on the fairness of the trial. This motion argues that the introduction of such statements was highly prejudicial and that a new trial should be granted to ensure a just outcome. When preparing a detailed description for a New Jersey Motion for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict, or in the Alternative, for a New Trial — for prejudicial statements at trial, ensure you incorporate relevant keywords. Keywords may include "New Jersey legal motion," "prejudicial statements at trial," "NOV motion," "motion for a new trial," "unfair trial outcome," "challenging jury's decision," and "court errors." These keywords will enhance the content's relevancy and help attract the appropriate audience looking for insights on this legal topic.