This is simply a short statement that states that, in the event of a conflict between the provisions of one Article and the terms and conditions contained in prior Articles provided for in the Agreement, the parties agree that the provisions of a designated Article shall prevail.
New Jersey Conflict of Terms refers to a legal concept within New Jersey's legal system that deals with the conflicts that may arise when interpreting the terms and provisions of different legal documents or agreements. It is particularly relevant in cases where there are inconsistencies or contradictions between different clauses, sections, or provisions within contracts, statutes, or regulations. The primary purpose of the New Jersey Conflict of Terms is to provide a framework for resolving conflicts or uncertainties in legal documents, ensuring fairness and justice in interpretations and implementations. It assists in determining which provision should prevail when conflicting expressions or terms exist. There are several types of New Jersey Conflict of Terms, including but not limited to: 1. Contractual Conflict: This type of conflict arises when there are inconsistencies or contradictions between two or more clauses within a contract. It could be related to payment terms, obligations, termination clauses, or any other provisions within the agreement. 2. Statutory Conflict: Legal conflicts may arise when different statutes or laws address the same subject, but their provisions contradict each other. Resolving these conflicts is vital to uphold legal consistency and ensure compliance with applicable laws. 3. Regulatory Conflict: In the context of administrative or regulatory matters, conflicts may arise between different regulations, rules, or guidelines issued by regulatory agencies or government bodies within New Jersey. Resolving these conflicts ensures uniformity and clarity in regulations. 4. Jurisdictional Conflict: Jurisdictional conflicts occur when different courts or jurisdictions interpret laws or provisions differently. Resolving such conflicts helps establish consistent legal interpretation across New Jersey's various courts. 5. Constitutional Conflict: Conflicts may also arise between state laws and the provisions of the New Jersey Constitution. In these cases, the courts need to carefully balance the constitutional rights while upholding the rule of law and ensuring a fair and just outcome. In conclusion, New Jersey Conflict of Terms is a crucial aspect of the state's legal system, aiming to resolve conflicts and inconsistencies that can arise in different legal documents and provisions. By providing a framework for interpretation and implementation, it ensures fairness, consistency, and adherence to the law in various contexts such as contracts, statutes, regulations, jurisdictions, and constitutional matters.New Jersey Conflict of Terms refers to a legal concept within New Jersey's legal system that deals with the conflicts that may arise when interpreting the terms and provisions of different legal documents or agreements. It is particularly relevant in cases where there are inconsistencies or contradictions between different clauses, sections, or provisions within contracts, statutes, or regulations. The primary purpose of the New Jersey Conflict of Terms is to provide a framework for resolving conflicts or uncertainties in legal documents, ensuring fairness and justice in interpretations and implementations. It assists in determining which provision should prevail when conflicting expressions or terms exist. There are several types of New Jersey Conflict of Terms, including but not limited to: 1. Contractual Conflict: This type of conflict arises when there are inconsistencies or contradictions between two or more clauses within a contract. It could be related to payment terms, obligations, termination clauses, or any other provisions within the agreement. 2. Statutory Conflict: Legal conflicts may arise when different statutes or laws address the same subject, but their provisions contradict each other. Resolving these conflicts is vital to uphold legal consistency and ensure compliance with applicable laws. 3. Regulatory Conflict: In the context of administrative or regulatory matters, conflicts may arise between different regulations, rules, or guidelines issued by regulatory agencies or government bodies within New Jersey. Resolving these conflicts ensures uniformity and clarity in regulations. 4. Jurisdictional Conflict: Jurisdictional conflicts occur when different courts or jurisdictions interpret laws or provisions differently. Resolving such conflicts helps establish consistent legal interpretation across New Jersey's various courts. 5. Constitutional Conflict: Conflicts may also arise between state laws and the provisions of the New Jersey Constitution. In these cases, the courts need to carefully balance the constitutional rights while upholding the rule of law and ensuring a fair and just outcome. In conclusion, New Jersey Conflict of Terms is a crucial aspect of the state's legal system, aiming to resolve conflicts and inconsistencies that can arise in different legal documents and provisions. By providing a framework for interpretation and implementation, it ensures fairness, consistency, and adherence to the law in various contexts such as contracts, statutes, regulations, jurisdictions, and constitutional matters.
