This form is a Motion In Limine to exclude certain performance evidence from an age discrimination case. Such a motion, if granted, would prevent the defense from offering any evidence of plaintiff's job performance or lack thereof as a reason for his discharge. Modify to fit your facts.
Title: New Mexico Plaintiff's Motion in Liming to Prohibit Evidence on the Issue of Performance, Productivity, and/or Efficiency Keywords: New Mexico, plaintiff, motion in liming, evidence, performance, productivity, efficiency Description: A New Mexico Plaintiff's Motion in Liming to Prohibit Evidence on the Issue of Performance, Productivity, and/or Efficiency is a legal document filed by the plaintiff (party initiating a lawsuit) in a court case in New Mexico. This motion seeks to exclude any evidence related to the performance, productivity, or efficiency of the plaintiff from being introduced or discussed during the trial. By filing this motion, the plaintiff aims to prevent the introduction of evidence that is irrelevant, prejudicial, or misleading. The plaintiff argues that evidence related to performance, productivity, or efficiency is not directly relevant to the issues at hand in the case and may unduly influence the jury's decision. Types of New Mexico Plaintiff's Motion in Liming to Prohibit Evidence on the Issue of Performance, Productivity, and/or Efficiency: 1. Specific Performance Motion: This type of motion focuses on prohibiting evidence specifically related to the performance of the plaintiff, such as work quality or benchmarks. 2. Productivity Motion: This motion seeks to exclude any evidence pertaining to the plaintiff's productivity, such as how many tasks were completed or the time taken to complete them. 3. Efficiency Motion: This motion aims to prevent the introduction of evidence related to the plaintiff's efficiency, such as the effectiveness of work methods or processes. In summary, a New Mexico Plaintiff's Motion in Liming to Prohibit Evidence on the Issue of Performance, Productivity, and/or Efficiency is a legal tool employed to limit the scope of evidence in a court case, ensuring that the trial focuses on relevant issues and prevents potentially prejudicial information from influencing the jury.
Title: New Mexico Plaintiff's Motion in Liming to Prohibit Evidence on the Issue of Performance, Productivity, and/or Efficiency Keywords: New Mexico, plaintiff, motion in liming, evidence, performance, productivity, efficiency Description: A New Mexico Plaintiff's Motion in Liming to Prohibit Evidence on the Issue of Performance, Productivity, and/or Efficiency is a legal document filed by the plaintiff (party initiating a lawsuit) in a court case in New Mexico. This motion seeks to exclude any evidence related to the performance, productivity, or efficiency of the plaintiff from being introduced or discussed during the trial. By filing this motion, the plaintiff aims to prevent the introduction of evidence that is irrelevant, prejudicial, or misleading. The plaintiff argues that evidence related to performance, productivity, or efficiency is not directly relevant to the issues at hand in the case and may unduly influence the jury's decision. Types of New Mexico Plaintiff's Motion in Liming to Prohibit Evidence on the Issue of Performance, Productivity, and/or Efficiency: 1. Specific Performance Motion: This type of motion focuses on prohibiting evidence specifically related to the performance of the plaintiff, such as work quality or benchmarks. 2. Productivity Motion: This motion seeks to exclude any evidence pertaining to the plaintiff's productivity, such as how many tasks were completed or the time taken to complete them. 3. Efficiency Motion: This motion aims to prevent the introduction of evidence related to the plaintiff's efficiency, such as the effectiveness of work methods or processes. In summary, a New Mexico Plaintiff's Motion in Liming to Prohibit Evidence on the Issue of Performance, Productivity, and/or Efficiency is a legal tool employed to limit the scope of evidence in a court case, ensuring that the trial focuses on relevant issues and prevents potentially prejudicial information from influencing the jury.