A motion to quash asks the judge for an order setting aside or nullifying an action, such as "quashing" service of a summons.
This form is a generic example that may be referred to when preparing such a form for your particular state. It is for illustrative purposes only. Local laws should be consulted to determine any specific requirements for such a form in a particular jurisdiction.
A New Mexico Affidavit in Support of Motion to Quash Subpoena Ducks Cecum on the Grounds that Subpoena is Unreasonable and Oppressive is a legal document filed in the state of New Mexico to request the court to invalidate a subpoena duces tecum (a subpoena compelling the production of specific documents or evidence) on the grounds that it is unfair, burdensome, or oppressive in nature. This affidavit serves as evidence supporting the motion to quash, outlining the reasons why the subpoena should be considered unreasonable and oppressive. The purpose of filing this affidavit is to protect the person or entity from unnecessary or unjustified intrusion into their privacy, confidential information, or to prevent an undue burden imposed on them by the subpoena. The affidavit should present compelling arguments demonstrating why compliance with the subpoena would be unfair, unduly burdensome, or oppressive. Some relevant keywords associated with a New Mexico Affidavit in Support of Motion to Quash Subpoena Ducks Cecum on the Grounds that Subpoena is Unreasonable and Oppressive include: 1. New Mexico: Refers to the state where the legal motion is being filed, indicating the jurisdiction in which the affidavit is applicable. 2. Affidavit: A written statement made under oath, used as a legal evidence to support a motion or claim. 3. Motion to Quash: A legal request to invalidate or nullify a subpoena, in this case, a subpoena duces tecum. 4. Subpoena Ducks Cecum: A legal document that compels the production of evidence or specific documents in a legal proceeding. 5. Unreasonable: Demonstrating that complying with the subpoena would be unreasonably burdensome or unfair to the person or entity being subpoenaed. 6. Oppressive: Illustrating that compliance with the subpoena would impose an excessive or undue burden on the individual or entity being subpoenaed. It is important to note that while the key purpose of the New Mexico Affidavit in Support of Motion to Quash Subpoena Ducks Cecum on the Grounds that Subpoena is Unreasonable and Oppressive is to challenge the subpoena's validity, specific details or additional types of affidavits may exist depending on the circumstances of the case, such as if there are multiple subpoenas or different legal grounds for challenging their reasonableness and oppression.A New Mexico Affidavit in Support of Motion to Quash Subpoena Ducks Cecum on the Grounds that Subpoena is Unreasonable and Oppressive is a legal document filed in the state of New Mexico to request the court to invalidate a subpoena duces tecum (a subpoena compelling the production of specific documents or evidence) on the grounds that it is unfair, burdensome, or oppressive in nature. This affidavit serves as evidence supporting the motion to quash, outlining the reasons why the subpoena should be considered unreasonable and oppressive. The purpose of filing this affidavit is to protect the person or entity from unnecessary or unjustified intrusion into their privacy, confidential information, or to prevent an undue burden imposed on them by the subpoena. The affidavit should present compelling arguments demonstrating why compliance with the subpoena would be unfair, unduly burdensome, or oppressive. Some relevant keywords associated with a New Mexico Affidavit in Support of Motion to Quash Subpoena Ducks Cecum on the Grounds that Subpoena is Unreasonable and Oppressive include: 1. New Mexico: Refers to the state where the legal motion is being filed, indicating the jurisdiction in which the affidavit is applicable. 2. Affidavit: A written statement made under oath, used as a legal evidence to support a motion or claim. 3. Motion to Quash: A legal request to invalidate or nullify a subpoena, in this case, a subpoena duces tecum. 4. Subpoena Ducks Cecum: A legal document that compels the production of evidence or specific documents in a legal proceeding. 5. Unreasonable: Demonstrating that complying with the subpoena would be unreasonably burdensome or unfair to the person or entity being subpoenaed. 6. Oppressive: Illustrating that compliance with the subpoena would impose an excessive or undue burden on the individual or entity being subpoenaed. It is important to note that while the key purpose of the New Mexico Affidavit in Support of Motion to Quash Subpoena Ducks Cecum on the Grounds that Subpoena is Unreasonable and Oppressive is to challenge the subpoena's validity, specific details or additional types of affidavits may exist depending on the circumstances of the case, such as if there are multiple subpoenas or different legal grounds for challenging their reasonableness and oppression.
