This form contains sample jury instructions, to be used across the United States. These questions are to be used only as a model, and should be altered to more perfectly fit your own cause of action needs.
New Mexico Jury Instruction — 2.2 With Comparative Negligence Defense is a legal instruction provided to jurors in New Mexico courts in cases involving comparative negligence. This instruction outlines the applicability and importance of the comparative negligence defense in determining the degree of fault and liability in a civil case. In cases where comparative negligence is a potential defense, New Mexico Jury Instruction — 2.2 instructs jurors to consider the extent to which each party is at fault for the plaintiff's injuries or damages. Under comparative negligence, the plaintiff's recovery may be reduced in proportion to their degree of fault. The purpose of this instruction is to guide the jurors in assessing and apportioning fault among the parties involved. It emphasizes the importance of considering the actions, behavior, and negligence of all parties, not just the plaintiff, in determining liability and damages. Keywords: New Mexico, jury instruction, 2.2, comparative negligence defense, civil case, legal instruction, fault, liability, damages, proportionate, apportionment, plaintiff, recovery, negligence, behavior. Different types of New Mexico Jury Instruction — 2.2 With Comparative Negligence Defense may include specific variations or modifications for different types of cases. Some examples are: 1. New Mexico Jury Instruction — 2.2 With Comparative Negligence Defense in Personal Injury Cases: This type of instruction would be tailored specifically for cases involving personal injury claims, such as automobile accidents, slip and falls, or medical malpractice. The instruction provides guidance on how to assess fault and damages in these specific types of cases. 2. New Mexico Jury Instruction — 2.2 With Comparative Negligence Defense in Product Liability Cases: This instruction would focus on cases involving defective products, providing jurors with guidance on how to evaluate the degree of fault between the injured party and the manufacturer, distributor, or seller of the product. 3. New Mexico Jury Instruction — 2.2 With Comparative Negligence Defense in Premises Liability Cases: This type of instruction would be applicable in cases where a person is injured on someone else's property due to unsafe conditions. It would guide the jurors in determining the extent of fault on both the property owner and the injured party. These variations of New Mexico Jury Instruction — 2.2 aim to provide specific guidance tailored to the nature and circumstances of different types of cases, ensuring a fair and accurate assessment of comparative negligence.
New Mexico Jury Instruction — 2.2 With Comparative Negligence Defense is a legal instruction provided to jurors in New Mexico courts in cases involving comparative negligence. This instruction outlines the applicability and importance of the comparative negligence defense in determining the degree of fault and liability in a civil case. In cases where comparative negligence is a potential defense, New Mexico Jury Instruction — 2.2 instructs jurors to consider the extent to which each party is at fault for the plaintiff's injuries or damages. Under comparative negligence, the plaintiff's recovery may be reduced in proportion to their degree of fault. The purpose of this instruction is to guide the jurors in assessing and apportioning fault among the parties involved. It emphasizes the importance of considering the actions, behavior, and negligence of all parties, not just the plaintiff, in determining liability and damages. Keywords: New Mexico, jury instruction, 2.2, comparative negligence defense, civil case, legal instruction, fault, liability, damages, proportionate, apportionment, plaintiff, recovery, negligence, behavior. Different types of New Mexico Jury Instruction — 2.2 With Comparative Negligence Defense may include specific variations or modifications for different types of cases. Some examples are: 1. New Mexico Jury Instruction — 2.2 With Comparative Negligence Defense in Personal Injury Cases: This type of instruction would be tailored specifically for cases involving personal injury claims, such as automobile accidents, slip and falls, or medical malpractice. The instruction provides guidance on how to assess fault and damages in these specific types of cases. 2. New Mexico Jury Instruction — 2.2 With Comparative Negligence Defense in Product Liability Cases: This instruction would focus on cases involving defective products, providing jurors with guidance on how to evaluate the degree of fault between the injured party and the manufacturer, distributor, or seller of the product. 3. New Mexico Jury Instruction — 2.2 With Comparative Negligence Defense in Premises Liability Cases: This type of instruction would be applicable in cases where a person is injured on someone else's property due to unsafe conditions. It would guide the jurors in determining the extent of fault on both the property owner and the injured party. These variations of New Mexico Jury Instruction — 2.2 aim to provide specific guidance tailored to the nature and circumstances of different types of cases, ensuring a fair and accurate assessment of comparative negligence.