This form contains sample jury instructions, to be used across the United States. These questions are to be used only as a model, and should be altered to more perfectly fit your own cause of action needs.
New Mexico Jury Instruction — 1.6.1 Equal Pay Act 29 USC Sect. 206 General Instruction is a crucial legal instruction used in employment discrimination cases concerning wage disparities between male and female employees. This instruction provides guidance to the jury on how to interpret and apply the provisions of the Equal Pay Act of 1963 (29 USC Sect. 206) within the context of New Mexico state law. Keywords: New Mexico, Jury Instruction, Equal Pay Act, 29 USC Sect. 206, General Instruction, employment discrimination, wage disparities, male and female employees, interpret, apply, provisions, context, state law. Types of New Mexico Jury Instruction — 1.6.1 Equal Pay Act 29 USC Sect. 206 General Instruction: 1. Introduction: This type of instruction provides an overview of the Equal Pay Act and its purpose. It establishes that the Act aims to eliminate gender-based wage discrimination and promote equal pay for substantially similar work performed under similar working conditions. 2. Prima Facie Case: This type of instruction outlines the elements required to establish a prima facie case of unequal pay under the Equal Pay Act. It highlights that the plaintiff must demonstrate that the employer pays higher wages to employees of the opposite sex for substantially equal work. 3. Substantially Equal Work: This type of instruction clarifies the meaning of "substantially equal work" under the Equal Pay Act. It may explain the factors considered, such as skill, effort, responsibility, and working conditions, which determine the similarity of job duties. 4. Employer's Defense: This type of instruction outlines the defenses available to the employer in an Equal Pay Act claim. It may detail permissible reasons for wage differentials, such as seniority systems, merit-based systems, measures of earnings, or factors other than sex. 5. Burden of Proof: This type of instruction explains the burden of proof placed on the plaintiff and the defendant. It may outline that the plaintiff must prove that wage disparity is due to sex, while the defendant must provide evidence supporting a legitimate reason for the wage differential. 6. Calculation of Damages: This type of instruction guides the jury on how to calculate potential damages if liability is found. It may explain the factors to consider, such as lost wages, back pay, front pay, and potential future earnings. 7. Jury Deliberations: This type of instruction provides guidance on how the jury should approach their deliberations. It may suggest that the jury should review the evidence, apply the law to the facts, and reach a unanimous decision based on a preponderance of the evidence. These various types of New Mexico Jury Instruction — 1.6.1 Equal Pay Act 29 USC Sect. 206 General Instruction help provide a comprehensive framework for addressing Equal Pay Act claims in New Mexico courts, ensuring fair and just outcomes in cases involving wage discrimination.
New Mexico Jury Instruction — 1.6.1 Equal Pay Act 29 USC Sect. 206 General Instruction is a crucial legal instruction used in employment discrimination cases concerning wage disparities between male and female employees. This instruction provides guidance to the jury on how to interpret and apply the provisions of the Equal Pay Act of 1963 (29 USC Sect. 206) within the context of New Mexico state law. Keywords: New Mexico, Jury Instruction, Equal Pay Act, 29 USC Sect. 206, General Instruction, employment discrimination, wage disparities, male and female employees, interpret, apply, provisions, context, state law. Types of New Mexico Jury Instruction — 1.6.1 Equal Pay Act 29 USC Sect. 206 General Instruction: 1. Introduction: This type of instruction provides an overview of the Equal Pay Act and its purpose. It establishes that the Act aims to eliminate gender-based wage discrimination and promote equal pay for substantially similar work performed under similar working conditions. 2. Prima Facie Case: This type of instruction outlines the elements required to establish a prima facie case of unequal pay under the Equal Pay Act. It highlights that the plaintiff must demonstrate that the employer pays higher wages to employees of the opposite sex for substantially equal work. 3. Substantially Equal Work: This type of instruction clarifies the meaning of "substantially equal work" under the Equal Pay Act. It may explain the factors considered, such as skill, effort, responsibility, and working conditions, which determine the similarity of job duties. 4. Employer's Defense: This type of instruction outlines the defenses available to the employer in an Equal Pay Act claim. It may detail permissible reasons for wage differentials, such as seniority systems, merit-based systems, measures of earnings, or factors other than sex. 5. Burden of Proof: This type of instruction explains the burden of proof placed on the plaintiff and the defendant. It may outline that the plaintiff must prove that wage disparity is due to sex, while the defendant must provide evidence supporting a legitimate reason for the wage differential. 6. Calculation of Damages: This type of instruction guides the jury on how to calculate potential damages if liability is found. It may explain the factors to consider, such as lost wages, back pay, front pay, and potential future earnings. 7. Jury Deliberations: This type of instruction provides guidance on how the jury should approach their deliberations. It may suggest that the jury should review the evidence, apply the law to the facts, and reach a unanimous decision based on a preponderance of the evidence. These various types of New Mexico Jury Instruction — 1.6.1 Equal Pay Act 29 USC Sect. 206 General Instruction help provide a comprehensive framework for addressing Equal Pay Act claims in New Mexico courts, ensuring fair and just outcomes in cases involving wage discrimination.