The Nevada Challenge To Authority Or Action of Arbitrator is a procedure that allows a party to challenge the authority or action of an arbitrator. This process is regulated by the Nevada Arbitration Rules and Law and is an important part of the arbitration process. There are three types of challenges: jurisdiction, bias, and misconduct. Jurisdiction: This type of challenge is used to dispute the arbitrator’s authority to preside over the case. The challenge must be based on the arbitrator lacked jurisdiction over the dispute or did not follow the governing law. Bias: This type of challenge is used to dispute the arbitrator’s impartiality or fairness. The challenge must be based on a statement or conduct by the arbitrator that reveals a lack of impartiality or other bias. Misconduct: This type of challenge is used to dispute the arbitrator’s conduct or decision. The challenge must be based on the arbitrator’s failure to follow the procedures set out in the governing law or contract or some other misconduct. To challenge the authority or action of an arbitrator, the challenging party must file a motion with the court. The motion must include a statement of the facts, the legal basis for the challenge, and the relief sought. The motion must also be served on the other party and the arbitrator. After the motion is filed, the court will decide whether to allow the challenge. If the challenge is granted, the court may substitute a different arbitrator or take other appropriate action.