Nevada Opposition to Motion to Enter Mediated Agreement as Judgment is a legal document filed by a party in a Nevada court opposing the entry of a mediated agreement as a judgment. This document is used when a party does not agree with the terms of the mediated agreement or believes that it is not in their best interests to enter it as a judgment. The opposition must be filed with the court prior to the hearing on the motion to enter the mediated agreement as a judgment. The types of Nevada Opposition to Motion to Enter Mediated Agreement as Judgment include: • Argument opposition: This type of opposition includes legal arguments and factual evidence to support the party’s position that the mediated agreement should not be entered as a judgment. • Equitable opposition: This type of opposition is used when a party believes that the agreement is not fair or equitable and should not be entered as a judgment. • Procedural opposition: This type of opposition is used when a party believes that the procedures used in the mediation process were improper or inadequate, thus making the agreement invalid. • Constitutional opposition: This type of opposition is used when a party believes that the mediated agreement violates their constitutional rights.