The Nevada Order of Remand on Writ of Proceeded is a legal action taken by a higher court to send a case back to a lower court for further proceedings. This order is issued when the higher court determines that the lower court made an error or acted inappropriately during the trial or during the decision-making process. In Nevada, there are several types of Orders of Remand on Writ of Proceeded that can be issued, depending on the circumstances of the case. These include: 1. Remand for Further Findings: This type of order is issued when the higher court believes that the lower court made an inadequate or insufficient finding of fact or failed to properly apply the law to the case. The case is then sent back to the lower court to conduct further proceedings and to provide a more comprehensive analysis of the facts and law involved. 2. Remand for Reconsideration: This type of order is issued when the higher court believes that the lower court's decision was incorrect or flawed. The case is sent back to the lower court for reconsideration, allowing the lower court to review its decision and potentially revise it based on the higher court's guidance. 3. Remand for New Trial: This type of order is issued when the higher court determines that the lower court's decision was so fundamentally flawed or biased that a new trial is necessary. The case is returned to the lower court for a completely fresh trial, ensuring a fair and unbiased determination of the issues involved. 4. Remand for Clarification: This type of order is issued when the higher court finds that the lower court's decision or ruling is unclear or ambiguous. The case is remanded to the lower court with instructions to provide further clarification or explanation of its decision, allowing for a better understanding of the legal reasoning involved. The Nevada Order of Remand on Writ of Proceeded is an essential mechanism within the legal system that helps ensure fairness and justice in the resolution of cases. It allows the higher court to review and rectify any errors or issues that may have occurred during the lower court proceedings, ultimately leading to a more accurate determination of the matters at hand.