Nevada Jury Instruction — 1.2.1 Race And Or Sex Discrimination Discharge — Failure To PromotIncludingin— - Same Decision Defense: Race and sex discrimination cases in the workplace are unfortunately not uncommon. Nevada Jury Instruction — 1.2.1 addresses the issue of discrimination in the context of discharge and failure to promote, specifically encompassing the same decision defense. In cases involving race and/or sex discrimination, an employer may be accused of wrongfully discharging or failing to promote an individual based solely on their race or sex. Nevada Jury Instruction — 1.2.1 recognizes that such actions can be discriminatory and unjust. The instruction delves into the concept of the same decision defense, which is a potential legal argument that the employer may present. This defense asserts that the employee would have faced the same outcome regardless of their race or sex. In simpler terms, the employer argues that the decision was not motivated by discriminatory factors but rather by other valid reasons. It is crucial to understand that Nevada Jury Instruction — 1.2.1 focuses on cases where the same decision defense is raised concerning discharge or failure-to-promote claims in relation to race and/or sex discrimination. This instruction aids the jury in evaluating the validity of this defense and determining whether discrimination played a role in the employment decision. Different types of Nevada Jury Instruction — 1.2.1 Race And Or Sex Discrimination Discharge — Failure To PromotIncludingin— - Same Decision Defense may include variations based on the specific circumstances of each case. For example, variations might arise depending on the industry, the position held, or the nature of the alleged discriminatory action. Ultimately, Nevada Jury Instruction — 1.2.1 Race And Or Sex Discrimination Discharge — Failure To PromotIncludingin— - Same Decision Defense aims to guide jurors in comprehending the complexities of discrimination cases involving discharge and failure to promote, while highlighting the unique circumstance of the same decision defense.