Nevada Motion for Summary Judgment

• Category: Landlord Tenant - Actions
• State: Multi-State
• Control #: US-60929
• Format: Word; Rich Text

Description

Plaintiff moves to have summary judgment entered against defendant in an action concerning a default on an office lease. A Nevada Motion for Summary Judgment is a legal document filed by one party in a civil lawsuit with the intention of requesting the court to rule on the case without going to trial. This motion asserts that there are no genuine disputes of material facts in the litigation, and therefore, the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. A Motion for Summary Judgment can save time and expenses associated with a full trial if the court finds that no factual disputes exist, and there is no need for the case to move forward. In Nevada, there are various types of Motions for Summary Judgment, including: 1. Traditional Summary Judgment: This is the most common type of Motion for Summary Judgment, where the moving party argues that there are no genuine disputes of material fact and requests the court to rule in their favor based on the applicable law. 2. Summary Judgment by Affidavit: In certain cases, a party may file a Motion for Summary Judgment supported by sworn affidavits and other documentary evidence. The affidavits provide factual statements supporting the argument that there are no genuine disputes of material fact, making it suitable for summary judgment. 3. Partial Summary Judgment: A party may file a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment when they believe that specific claims or issues in a lawsuit can be resolved without trial. This motion allows the court to rule on only a portion of the case, leading to more efficient adjudication and potentially narrowing the issues for trial. 4. Summary Adjudication: This motion is utilized when a party seeks a judgment on particular issues that are susceptible to summary disposition. Summary Adjudication allows for the resolution of discrete legal issues rather than the entire case. 5. Summary Judgment on Limitation of Liability: In cases where a defendant claims a limitation of liability based on certain statutes or contracts, this motion seeks to establish that the defendant's liability is limited as a matter of law. 6. Summary Judgment Based on Qualified Immunity: In cases involving government officials or entities, this motion asserts that the defendant is immune from liability due to qualified immunity, which protects officials from personal liability when performing discretionary functions within their authority. When filing a Motion for Summary Judgment in Nevada, it is crucial to thoroughly analyze the facts, law, and evidence, ensuring that there are no genuine disputes of material fact that necessitate a trial. Attorneys skilled in civil litigation often use these motions strategically to seek a favorable judgment or narrow the issues for trial while saving time and resources for both parties involved.

A Nevada Motion for Summary Judgment is a legal document filed by one party in a civil lawsuit with the intention of requesting the court to rule on the case without going to trial. This motion asserts that there are no genuine disputes of material facts in the litigation, and therefore, the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. A Motion for Summary Judgment can save time and expenses associated with a full trial if the court finds that no factual disputes exist, and there is no need for the case to move forward. In Nevada, there are various types of Motions for Summary Judgment, including: 1. Traditional Summary Judgment: This is the most common type of Motion for Summary Judgment, where the moving party argues that there are no genuine disputes of material fact and requests the court to rule in their favor based on the applicable law. 2. Summary Judgment by Affidavit: In certain cases, a party may file a Motion for Summary Judgment supported by sworn affidavits and other documentary evidence. The affidavits provide factual statements supporting the argument that there are no genuine disputes of material fact, making it suitable for summary judgment. 3. Partial Summary Judgment: A party may file a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment when they believe that specific claims or issues in a lawsuit can be resolved without trial. This motion allows the court to rule on only a portion of the case, leading to more efficient adjudication and potentially narrowing the issues for trial. 4. Summary Adjudication: This motion is utilized when a party seeks a judgment on particular issues that are susceptible to summary disposition. Summary Adjudication allows for the resolution of discrete legal issues rather than the entire case. 5. Summary Judgment on Limitation of Liability: In cases where a defendant claims a limitation of liability based on certain statutes or contracts, this motion seeks to establish that the defendant's liability is limited as a matter of law. 6. Summary Judgment Based on Qualified Immunity: In cases involving government officials or entities, this motion asserts that the defendant is immune from liability due to qualified immunity, which protects officials from personal liability when performing discretionary functions within their authority. When filing a Motion for Summary Judgment in Nevada, it is crucial to thoroughly analyze the facts, law, and evidence, ensuring that there are no genuine disputes of material fact that necessitate a trial. Attorneys skilled in civil litigation often use these motions strategically to seek a favorable judgment or narrow the issues for trial while saving time and resources for both parties involved.