New York Boundary Line Agreement

• Category: Real Estate - Adjoining Property
• State: Multi-State
• Control #: US-00440
• Format: Word; Rich Text

Description

This Boundary Line Agreement is used for parties who have disputed over the boundaries of a piece of real estate. The parties agree that by execution of this Agreement, they are quitclaiming their respective interests to the appropriate party on the other side of the dividing line. A surveyor's drawing of the disputed land and relative tracts of all parties should be attached for clarification. The New York Boundary Line Agreement refers to a legal agreement that establishes the territorial boundaries of the state of New York in the United States. The agreement determines the geographic limits of New York, aiming to prevent disputes or conflicts over land ownership or jurisdictional matters with neighboring states. There are two major types of New York Boundary Line Agreements: 1. Interstate Boundary Line Agreements: These agreements determine the boundaries between New York and its neighboring states, primarily Connecticut, Massachusetts, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Vermont. The agreements specify the exact coordinates or physical features that mark the dividing line between the states, such as rivers, mountains, or survey markers. For example, the boundary with Massachusetts is defined by the Housatonic River, while the line with Pennsylvania is demarcated by the Delaware River. 2. Indian Land Boundary Line Agreement: This agreement aims to establish the boundaries between the lands of Native American tribes and the state of New York. It ensures clear delineation between state-owned lands and the territories owned or reserved by Native American communities, also known as Indian Reservations. These agreements are crucial in maintaining the sovereignty and self-governance of the tribes while defining the extent of their reservation land within the state. The New York Boundary Line Agreements are often the result of extensive negotiations and legal settlements between the relevant jurisdictions. They have historical significance as they shape governmental authority, land usage, and the allocation of resources within the state. Additionally, they contribute to maintaining peace and effective governance by clarifying the legal rights and responsibilities of the involved parties.

The New York Boundary Line Agreement refers to a legal agreement that establishes the territorial boundaries of the state of New York in the United States. The agreement determines the geographic limits of New York, aiming to prevent disputes or conflicts over land ownership or jurisdictional matters with neighboring states. There are two major types of New York Boundary Line Agreements: 1. Interstate Boundary Line Agreements: These agreements determine the boundaries between New York and its neighboring states, primarily Connecticut, Massachusetts, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Vermont. The agreements specify the exact coordinates or physical features that mark the dividing line between the states, such as rivers, mountains, or survey markers. For example, the boundary with Massachusetts is defined by the Housatonic River, while the line with Pennsylvania is demarcated by the Delaware River. 2. Indian Land Boundary Line Agreement: This agreement aims to establish the boundaries between the lands of Native American tribes and the state of New York. It ensures clear delineation between state-owned lands and the territories owned or reserved by Native American communities, also known as Indian Reservations. These agreements are crucial in maintaining the sovereignty and self-governance of the tribes while defining the extent of their reservation land within the state. The New York Boundary Line Agreements are often the result of extensive negotiations and legal settlements between the relevant jurisdictions. They have historical significance as they shape governmental authority, land usage, and the allocation of resources within the state. Additionally, they contribute to maintaining peace and effective governance by clarifying the legal rights and responsibilities of the involved parties.