New York Jury Instruction - 7.2 Duty To Deliberate When Both Plaintiff and Defendant Claim Damages or When Damages Are Not an Issue

• Category: Federal - Jury Instructions - Basic Civil Claim Instructions
• State: Multi-State
• Control #: US-11CB-7-2
• Format: Word; Rich Text

Description

This form contains sample jury instructions, to be used across the United States. These questions are to be used only as a model, and should be altered to more perfectly fit your own cause of action needs. New York Jury Instruction — 7.2 Duty To Deliberate When Both Plaintiff and Defendant Claim Damages or When Damages Are Not an Issue Keywords: New York, jury instruction, duty to deliberate, plaintiff, defendant, damages In a New York jury trial, when both the plaintiff and defendant claim damages or when damages are not an issue, the jury is given specific instructions regarding their duty to deliberate. This instruction ensures that the jury fulfills its responsibility to carefully consider the evidence, arguments, and instructions provided by the court before rendering a verdict. Type 1: Duty To Deliberate When Both Plaintiff and Defendant Claim Damages When both the plaintiff and defendant claim damages, the jury must consider the evidence presented by both parties. They should assess the strength, credibility, and relevance of the evidence in determining the extent of damages claimed. The jury should also evaluate any expert testimony, witness accounts, or documentary evidence provided to support or dispute the claimed damages. Additionally, the jury should carefully review the court's instructions on the legal standards regarding damages and apply them to the evidence presented. Type 2: Duty To Deliberate When Damages Are Not an Issue In cases where damages are not in dispute, the jury still has a duty to deliberate. They must review and assess the evidence related to liability and any other relevant issues specific to the case. Although damages may not be contested, the jury must thoroughly analyze the evidence to determine liability and reach a fair and just verdict based on the facts presented. They should carefully consider witness testimony, documents, exhibits, and any legal instructions provided by the court before rendering a verdict. Overall, regardless of whether damages are contested or not, the jury must engage in thorough deliberation to ensure a fair and just resolution to the case. They should carefully analyze all evidence, witness credibility, expert testimonies, and any legal instructions provided by the court. The duty to deliberate is a crucial aspect of the jury's role in the trial process, ensuring that they carefully evaluate all relevant factors before reaching a verdict.

New York Jury Instruction — 7.2 Duty To Deliberate When Both Plaintiff and Defendant Claim Damages or When Damages Are Not an Issue Keywords: New York, jury instruction, duty to deliberate, plaintiff, defendant, damages In a New York jury trial, when both the plaintiff and defendant claim damages or when damages are not an issue, the jury is given specific instructions regarding their duty to deliberate. This instruction ensures that the jury fulfills its responsibility to carefully consider the evidence, arguments, and instructions provided by the court before rendering a verdict. Type 1: Duty To Deliberate When Both Plaintiff and Defendant Claim Damages When both the plaintiff and defendant claim damages, the jury must consider the evidence presented by both parties. They should assess the strength, credibility, and relevance of the evidence in determining the extent of damages claimed. The jury should also evaluate any expert testimony, witness accounts, or documentary evidence provided to support or dispute the claimed damages. Additionally, the jury should carefully review the court's instructions on the legal standards regarding damages and apply them to the evidence presented. Type 2: Duty To Deliberate When Damages Are Not an Issue In cases where damages are not in dispute, the jury still has a duty to deliberate. They must review and assess the evidence related to liability and any other relevant issues specific to the case. Although damages may not be contested, the jury must thoroughly analyze the evidence to determine liability and reach a fair and just verdict based on the facts presented. They should carefully consider witness testimony, documents, exhibits, and any legal instructions provided by the court before rendering a verdict. Overall, regardless of whether damages are contested or not, the jury must engage in thorough deliberation to ensure a fair and just resolution to the case. They should carefully analyze all evidence, witness credibility, expert testimonies, and any legal instructions provided by the court. The duty to deliberate is a crucial aspect of the jury's role in the trial process, ensuring that they carefully evaluate all relevant factors before reaching a verdict.