This form contains sample jury instructions, to be used across the United States. These questions are to be used only as a model, and should be altered to more perfectly fit your own cause of action needs.
New York Jury Instruction — Credibility of Witnesses In a court trial, the credibility of witnesses plays a crucial role in determining the weight and value of their testimony. New York jury instructions provide guidance to jurors regarding the assessment of witness credibility. These instructions aim to assist jurors in evaluating and discerning the trustworthiness, truthfulness, and reliability of witnesses' testimony. Several types of New York jury instructions related to witness credibility exist, including: 1. New York Standard Jury Instruction (NY SKI) — Witness Credibility: This instruction provides a comprehensive overview of how jurors should assess witness credibility. It emphasizes that jurors must consider various factors and use their common sense and judgment to evaluate the truthfulness, demeanor, ability to perceive, and potential biases of witnesses. The instruction may further highlight the importance of assessing witnesses' consistency, prior inconsistent statements, or motives, if applicable. 2. New York Jury Instruction — Credibility of Expert Witnesses: In cases involving expert witnesses (such as doctors, forensic experts, or engineers), this instruction offers specific guidance on evaluating their credibility. Jurors are instructed to consider the qualifications, experience, methodology, and objectivity of expert witnesses. It emphasizes that jurors should weigh the opinions and conclusions of expert witnesses based on their expertise and the soundness of their reasoning. 3. New York Jury Instruction — Credibility of Eyewitnesses: Eyewitness testimony is often deemed impactful in trials. This instruction provides guidance to jurors on assessing the credibility of eyewitnesses' testimony. It may address factors such as the witness's opportunity to observe, clarity of memory, level of attention, any inconsistencies in their accounts, and potential biases or prejudices. 4. New York Jury Instruction — Credibility and Prior Convictions: When a witness has a prior criminal conviction, this instruction guides jurors on evaluating witness credibility while considering their past convictions. It emphasizes that the jury should not automatically discredit a witness solely based on their prior conviction(s), but rather assess whether the conviction(s) impact the witness's reliability and truthfulness in the current case. 5. New York Jury Instruction — Credibility and Character Evidence: This instruction addresses the use of character evidence in assessing witness credibility. It emphasizes that jurors should focus on evaluating the witness's truthfulness or untruthfulness based on their testimony and behavior during the trial, rather than on their general reputation for truthfulness or untruthfulness. In summary, New York jury instructions regarding witness credibility provide jurors with guidelines to assess the reliability and trustworthiness of witness testimony. Whether it pertains to assessing the credibility of expert witnesses, eyewitnesses, or witnesses with prior convictions, these instructions aim to assist jurors in reaching fair and just verdicts.
New York Jury Instruction — Credibility of Witnesses In a court trial, the credibility of witnesses plays a crucial role in determining the weight and value of their testimony. New York jury instructions provide guidance to jurors regarding the assessment of witness credibility. These instructions aim to assist jurors in evaluating and discerning the trustworthiness, truthfulness, and reliability of witnesses' testimony. Several types of New York jury instructions related to witness credibility exist, including: 1. New York Standard Jury Instruction (NY SKI) — Witness Credibility: This instruction provides a comprehensive overview of how jurors should assess witness credibility. It emphasizes that jurors must consider various factors and use their common sense and judgment to evaluate the truthfulness, demeanor, ability to perceive, and potential biases of witnesses. The instruction may further highlight the importance of assessing witnesses' consistency, prior inconsistent statements, or motives, if applicable. 2. New York Jury Instruction — Credibility of Expert Witnesses: In cases involving expert witnesses (such as doctors, forensic experts, or engineers), this instruction offers specific guidance on evaluating their credibility. Jurors are instructed to consider the qualifications, experience, methodology, and objectivity of expert witnesses. It emphasizes that jurors should weigh the opinions and conclusions of expert witnesses based on their expertise and the soundness of their reasoning. 3. New York Jury Instruction — Credibility of Eyewitnesses: Eyewitness testimony is often deemed impactful in trials. This instruction provides guidance to jurors on assessing the credibility of eyewitnesses' testimony. It may address factors such as the witness's opportunity to observe, clarity of memory, level of attention, any inconsistencies in their accounts, and potential biases or prejudices. 4. New York Jury Instruction — Credibility and Prior Convictions: When a witness has a prior criminal conviction, this instruction guides jurors on evaluating witness credibility while considering their past convictions. It emphasizes that the jury should not automatically discredit a witness solely based on their prior conviction(s), but rather assess whether the conviction(s) impact the witness's reliability and truthfulness in the current case. 5. New York Jury Instruction — Credibility and Character Evidence: This instruction addresses the use of character evidence in assessing witness credibility. It emphasizes that jurors should focus on evaluating the witness's truthfulness or untruthfulness based on their testimony and behavior during the trial, rather than on their general reputation for truthfulness or untruthfulness. In summary, New York jury instructions regarding witness credibility provide jurors with guidelines to assess the reliability and trustworthiness of witness testimony. Whether it pertains to assessing the credibility of expert witnesses, eyewitnesses, or witnesses with prior convictions, these instructions aim to assist jurors in reaching fair and just verdicts.