New York Voting Agreement between ID Recap, Inc. and Steven R. Matzkin regarding exchange of shares of capital stock

• Category: Corporations - Public - Voting Agreements
• State: Multi-State
• Control #: US-EG-9335
• Format: Word; Rich Text

Description

Voting Agreement between ID Recap, Inc. and Steven R. Matzkin regarding exchange of shares of capital stock dated October 22, 1999. 6 pages. The New York Voting Agreement is a legally binding contract entered into between ID Recap, Inc. and Steven R. Catkin for the exchange of shares of capital stock. This agreement outlines the terms and conditions under which the shares will be exchanged, ensuring that both parties can exercise their voting rights in a mutually beneficial manner. Keywords: New York Voting Agreement, ID Recap, Inc., Steven R. Catkin, exchange of shares, capital stock, voting rights, agreement, terms and conditions, legally binding, contract. There are several types of New York Voting Agreements that may exist between ID Recap, Inc. and Steven R. Catkin, each of which may have specific names based on the terms of the agreement. Some of these types may include: 1. General New York Voting Agreement: This is a standard agreement that sets the guidelines for exchanging shares of capital stock and exercising voting rights. 2. Majority Voting Agreement: This type of agreement requires a majority of consent from both ID Recap, Inc. and Steven R. Catkin before any exchange of shares or voting rights can occur. 3. Minimum Voting Agreement: In this type of agreement, a minimum number of votes or shares are required to be exchanged between the parties for the agreement to be considered valid. 4. Differential Voting Agreement: This agreement may stipulate that certain shares have more voting power than others, based on specific criteria outlined in the agreement. 5. Contingent Voting Agreement: This type of agreement may come into effect only under certain predetermined conditions, such as the achievement of specific business goals or milestones. It is important to note that the specific names and types of New York Voting Agreements may vary based on the negotiations and agreements reached between ID Recap, Inc. and Steven R. Catkin, and therefore, these examples are merely illustrative.

The New York Voting Agreement is a legally binding contract entered into between ID Recap, Inc. and Steven R. Catkin for the exchange of shares of capital stock. This agreement outlines the terms and conditions under which the shares will be exchanged, ensuring that both parties can exercise their voting rights in a mutually beneficial manner. Keywords: New York Voting Agreement, ID Recap, Inc., Steven R. Catkin, exchange of shares, capital stock, voting rights, agreement, terms and conditions, legally binding, contract. There are several types of New York Voting Agreements that may exist between ID Recap, Inc. and Steven R. Catkin, each of which may have specific names based on the terms of the agreement. Some of these types may include: 1. General New York Voting Agreement: This is a standard agreement that sets the guidelines for exchanging shares of capital stock and exercising voting rights. 2. Majority Voting Agreement: This type of agreement requires a majority of consent from both ID Recap, Inc. and Steven R. Catkin before any exchange of shares or voting rights can occur. 3. Minimum Voting Agreement: In this type of agreement, a minimum number of votes or shares are required to be exchanged between the parties for the agreement to be considered valid. 4. Differential Voting Agreement: This agreement may stipulate that certain shares have more voting power than others, based on specific criteria outlined in the agreement. 5. Contingent Voting Agreement: This type of agreement may come into effect only under certain predetermined conditions, such as the achievement of specific business goals or milestones. It is important to note that the specific names and types of New York Voting Agreements may vary based on the negotiations and agreements reached between ID Recap, Inc. and Steven R. Catkin, and therefore, these examples are merely illustrative.