New York Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on the Issue of Liability is a legal procedure filed by parties involved in a lawsuit in order to request the court to render a judgment regarding liability. In this motion, the party seeking the judgment asserts that no genuine issue of material fact exists, and therefore the judge should rule in their favor on the issue of liability before proceeding to trial. There are different types of New York Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on the Issue of Liability, including the following: 1. Negligence: This motion type involves cases where one party is claiming that the other party's negligence caused the injuries or damages alleged in the case. The moving party aims to establish that the opposing party is responsible for the harm suffered. 2. Breach of Contract: This motion type arises in contractual disputes, where one party alleges that the other party failed to fulfill their contractual obligations. The moving party seeks to prove that the opposing party breached the terms of the agreement, resulting in liability. 3. Strict Liability: For cases involving strict liability, where liability is imposed regardless of fault, this motion can be used to request the court to determine if the criteria for strict liability are met. The moving party argues that the opposing party is strictly liable for the damages or injuries sustained. 4. Product Liability: In product liability cases, where a defective product causes harm, this motion can be employed to demonstrate that the opposing party is strictly liable for the defects in the product, leading to liability for the injuries inflicted. By filing a New York Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on the Issue of Liability, the moving party aims to expedite the legal process by obtaining a determination on liability before proceeding to trial. If successful, the judgment can significantly impact the outcome of the case, potentially leading to a favorable settlement or even dismissal of the claims against the moving party. It is important to note that the opposing party can also file a response to the motion, arguing that there are genuine issues of material fact that should be resolved at trial. The court will then review the motion and the response and make a ruling based on the evidence and legal arguments presented by both parties.