This form is a Complaint. This action was filed by the plaintiff due to a strip search which was conducted upon his/her person after an arrest. The plaintiff requests that he/she be awarded compensatory damages and punitive damages for the alleged violation of his/her constitutional rights.
Oklahoma Complaint For Strip Search - 4th and 14th Amendment, US Constitution - Jury Trial Demand
Category:
State:
Multi-State
Control #:
US-000282
Format:
Word;
Rich Text
Instant download
This website is not affiliated with any governmental entity
Public form
Description
How to fill out Complaint For Strip Search - 4th And 14th Amendment, US Constitution - Jury Trial Demand?
Choosing the best legal file web template could be a battle. Naturally, there are tons of web templates available on the Internet, but how will you get the legal form you want? Take advantage of the US Legal Forms website. The support offers 1000s of web templates, like the Oklahoma Complaint For Strip Search - 4th and 14th Amendment, US Constitution - Jury Trial Demand, which can be used for organization and personal needs. All the types are examined by professionals and meet state and federal needs.
If you are already signed up, log in to the accounts and click on the Down load switch to obtain the Oklahoma Complaint For Strip Search - 4th and 14th Amendment, US Constitution - Jury Trial Demand. Use your accounts to look from the legal types you have ordered earlier. Check out the My Forms tab of the accounts and obtain yet another copy of your file you want.
If you are a new user of US Legal Forms, listed here are easy directions that you should stick to:
- Very first, make sure you have selected the proper form for the town/region. You may look through the shape making use of the Preview switch and look at the shape explanation to make sure it is the best for you.
- When the form will not meet your preferences, make use of the Seach industry to obtain the correct form.
- When you are sure that the shape is acceptable, click the Acquire now switch to obtain the form.
- Opt for the costs prepare you desire and enter the required information and facts. Design your accounts and buy the order making use of your PayPal accounts or bank card.
- Opt for the submit format and obtain the legal file web template to the product.
- Comprehensive, change and produce and sign the attained Oklahoma Complaint For Strip Search - 4th and 14th Amendment, US Constitution - Jury Trial Demand.
US Legal Forms will be the largest local library of legal types for which you can find various file web templates. Take advantage of the company to obtain professionally-made papers that stick to condition needs.
Form popularity
FAQ
For example, in Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co. (2009), the Court held that having a West Virginia State Supreme Court Justice rule on a case ? one party of which had donated millions of dollars to his election for justice ? was an unconstitutional violation of Procedural Due Process.
If it has been determined, by a court of law, that your due process has been violated then it is very likely that the ruling that violated it will be overturned or struck void.
Governmental actors violate due process when they frustrate the fairness of proceedings, such as when a prosecutor fails to disclose evidence to a criminal defendant that suggests they may be innocent of the crime, or when a judge is biased against a criminal defendant or a party in a civil action.
In other words, the laws of a state must treat an individual in the same manner as other people in similar conditions and circumstances. A violation would occur, for example, if a state prohibited an individual from entering into an employment contract because he or she was a member of a particular race.
Due process of law involves two types of processes: (a) procedural due process ? Is the process fair? and (b) substantive due process - Does the government have the right to bring the action in the first place? In performing the LHO duties and responsibilities, you must be concerned with whether the process is fair.
In Lochner v New York (1905), the Supreme Court found unconstitutional a New York law regulating the working hours of bakers, ruling that the public benefit of the law was not enough to justify the substantive due process right of the bakers to work under their own terms.