Oklahoma's Reasonable Doubt by Single Juror refers to a specific legal concept within the state's criminal justice system. When a jury is deliberating a criminal case, each juror plays a crucial role in determining the defendant's guilt or innocence. In Oklahoma, the principle of reasonable doubt exists to protect individuals from being wrongfully convicted. Reasonable doubt by a single juror means that if even one juror has a reasonable doubt about a defendant's guilt, they must vote for acquittal. This principle recognizes the importance of each juror's independent thinking and emphasizes the high standard of proof required for a conviction. It ensures that a defendant is not found guilty solely based on a majority decision, but rather on a unanimous agreement among all jurors. There are no distinct types of Oklahoma's reasonable doubt by single juror; rather, it is a fundamental principle that applies uniformly to all criminal cases tried in the state. Its purpose is to safeguard against wrongful convictions and uphold the principles of fairness and justice. Keywords: Oklahoma, reasonable doubt, single juror, criminal justice system, legal concept, deliberating, guilt or innocence, wrongful conviction, acquittal, high standard of proof, unanimous agreement, fundamental principle, criminal cases.