The law regarding a motion attacking sentence of a federal court is set forth in 28 USC § 2255.
(a) A prisoner in custody under sentence of a court established by Act of Congress claiming the right to be released upon the ground that the sentence was imposed in violation of the Constitution or laws of the United States, or that the court was without jurisdiction to impose such sentence, or that the sentence was in excess of the maximum authorized by law, or is otherwise subject to collateral attack, may move the court which imposed the sentence to vacate, set aside or correct the sentence.
(b) Unless the motion and the files and records of the case conclusively show that the prisoner is entitled to no relief, the court shall cause notice thereof to be served upon the United States attorney, grant a prompt hearing thereon, determine the issues and make findings of fact and conclusions of law with respect thereto. If the court finds that the judgment was rendered without jurisdiction, or that the sentence imposed was not authorized by law or otherwise open to collateral attack, or that there has been such a denial or infringement of the constitutional rights of the prisoner as to render the judgment vulnerable to collateral attack, the court shall vacate and set the judgment aside and shall discharge the prisoner or resentence him or grant a new trial or correct the sentence as may appear appropriate.
(c) A court may entertain and determine such motion without requiring the production of the prisoner at the hearing.
(d) An appeal may be taken to the court of appeals from the order entered on the motion as from a final judgment on application for a writ of habeas corpus.
(e) An application for a writ of habeas corpus in behalf of a prisoner who is authorized to apply for relief by motion pursuant to this section, shall not be entertained if it appears that the applicant has failed to apply for relief, by motion, to the court which sentenced him, or that such court has denied him relief, unless it also appears that the remedy by motion is inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of his detention.
(f) A 1-year period of limitation shall apply to a motion under this section. The limitation period shall run from the latest of(1) the date on which the judgment of conviction becomes final;
(2) the date on which the impediment to making a motion created by governmental action in violation of the Constitution or laws of the United States is removed, if the movant was prevented from making a motion by such governmental action;
(3) the date on which the right asserted was initially recognized by the Supreme Court, if that right has been newly recognized by the Supreme Court and made retroactively applicable to cases on collateral review; or
(4) the date on which the facts supporting the claim or claims presented could have been discovered through the exercise of due diligence.
(g) Except as provided in section 408 of the Controlled Substances Act, in all proceedings brought under this section, and any subsequent proceedings on review, the court may appoint counsel, except as provided by a rule promulgated by the Supreme Court pursuant to statutory authority. Appointment of counsel under this section shall be governed by section 3006A of title 18.
(h) A second or successive motion must be certified as provided in section 2244 by a panel of the appropriate court of appeals to contain
(1) newly discovered evidence that, if proven and viewed in light of the evidence as a whole, would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence that no reasonable factfinder would have found the movant guilty of the offense; or
(2) a new rule of constitutional law, made retroactive to cases on collateral review by the Supreme Court, that was previously unavailable.
The Oklahoma Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, Modify, or Correct a Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody is a legal procedure that allows individuals who are currently held in federal custody in Oklahoma to seek relief from their sentence. This motion provides an avenue for defendants to challenge the legality or validity of their sentence and request a correction or modification. There are several types of Oklahoma Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, Modify, or Correct a Sentence that can be filed by a person in federal custody. Some of these include: 1. Motion to Vacate: This type of motion requests the court to nullify or invalidate the existing sentence due to various legal grounds, such as constitutional violations, ineffective assistance of counsel, or newly discovered evidence. 2. Motion to Set Aside: In this type of motion, the person in federal custody seeks to have their sentence declared null and void based on specific legal grounds, such as improper sentencing procedures, procedural errors, or violations of their due process rights. 3. Motion to Modify: This motion seeks a change to the existing sentence, often requesting a reduction in the length or severity of the sentence, based on new information, changes in circumstances, or compelling reasons. 4. Motion to Correct: This type of motion requests the court to correct errors or mistakes made during the sentencing process, such as errors in calculating the guideline range, misapplication of sentencing enhancements, or incorrect inclusion of prior convictions. When filing any of these motions, it is crucial to provide relevant supporting evidence, legal arguments, and cite applicable laws and precedents. It is recommended to seek the assistance of an experienced attorney who specializes in federal criminal law to navigate the complexities of the process and ensure the best possible outcome. In conclusion, the Oklahoma Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, Modify, or Correct a Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody offers individuals held in federal custody the opportunity to challenge the legality or correctness of their sentence. By filing one of the mentioned types of motions, individuals can seek relief, such as vacating the sentence altogether, setting it aside, modifying its terms, or correcting any errors. Seeking the guidance of a knowledgeable attorney is paramount to effectively navigate this legal process.
