Oklahoma Jury Instruction — 3 Credibility Of Witnesses, often referred to as "JI-3" in legal circles, is a set of instructions provided to the jury during a trial in Oklahoma. These instructions specifically address the evaluation and assessment of witness credibility, which plays a crucial role in determining the weight that should be given to their testimony. In Oklahoma, there are several types of JI-3 instructions available, each focusing on different aspects of witness credibility. Some of these relevant types include: 1. JI-3.1: Impeachment — This instruction deals with the credibility of a witness who has been shown to have made prior inconsistent statements or whose character for truthfulness has been challenged. It explains to the jury that they may disregard or give less weight to the testimony of the witness if they find them less trustworthy based on these factors. 2. JI-3.2: Bias or Interest — This instruction is given when there is evidence to suggest that a witness may have a personal bias or a vested interest in the outcome of the case. It advises the jury to consider such factors when evaluating the credibility of the witness and the potential motivations that may be influencing their testimony. 3. JI-3.3: Contradictory Evidence — When there are conflicting statements or evidence presented by different witnesses, this instruction guides the jury on how to assess the credibility of each witness. It highlights the importance of considering inconsistencies in their testimony and other relevant evidence when determining how much weight to give to their statements. 4. JI-3.4: Prior Convictions — If a witness has a prior criminal conviction, this instruction provides guidance to the jury on how to evaluate the credibility of that witness. It emphasizes that a conviction does not automatically make the witness less credible, but the jury should consider it as a factor when determining the weight to assign to their testimony. 5. JI-3.5: Character for Honesty — This instruction is used when a witness's character for honesty has been attacked or defended. It advises the jury on how to evaluate the credibility of the witness based on their general reputation for truthfulness or dishonesty within the community. These are just a few examples of the different types of Oklahoma Jury Instruction — 3 Credibility Of Witnesses that exist. Each instruction is provided to the jury to help them make informed decisions about the credibility and reliability of witness testimony, ultimately aiding them in arriving at a just verdict.