Oklahoma Jury Instruction — 3.3.1 Section 1, Per Se Violation Conspiracy To Fix Prices — Includes Alternative Rule of Reason Instruction, is an important legal instruction provided to the jury in Oklahoma during criminal trials related to antitrust and price-fixing conspiracies. This instruction guides the jurors in understanding the elements required to establish a violation of antitrust laws, particularly in cases involving price-fixing conspiracies. The key purpose of this jury instruction is to determine whether the defendants participated in an illegal agreement or conspiracy to fix prices, which violates both state and federal antitrust laws. The instruction provides detailed guidance to the jury regarding the specific legal standards they should apply during their deliberation. It aims to ensure a fair trial and consistent outcomes in cases involving antitrust violations. This particular jury instruction also includes an alternative Rule of Reason instruction, which provides an alternative legal framework for analyzing the defendants' conduct. Rule of Reason analysis involves a more flexible approach compared to the per se violation standard. While per se violations consider certain agreements or conduct as inherently illegal, the Rule of Reason analysis examines the overall impact on competition and consumer welfare before concluding whether the defendants' actions were anticompetitive or not. It is important to note that Oklahoma Jury Instruction — 3.3.1 Section 1 is specific to cases of conspiracy to fix prices, but there may be other instructions related to different types of antitrust violations or related offenses. Some of these instructions may include: 1. Oklahoma Jury Instruction — 3.3.1 Section 2: Price Discrimination Violation — This instruction provides guidance to the jurors when determining if the defendant engaged in unlawful price discrimination, allowing them to evaluate if the defendant provided different prices or terms to similarly situated buyers, thereby injuring competition. 2. Oklahoma Jury Instruction — 3.3.1 Section 3: Monopolization Violation — This instruction outlines the elements required to establish a monopolization offense, allowing the jurors to examine if the defendant possessed monopoly power in a relevant market and willfully engaged in anticompetitive conduct to acquire or maintain that power. 3. Oklahoma Jury Instruction — 3.3.1 Section 4: Attempted Monopolization Violation — This instruction assists jurors in determining if the defendant engaged in conduct with the specific intent to unlawfully acquire or maintain a monopoly position in a given market, even if the attempt was unsuccessful. By following these specific instructions, the jury can effectively evaluate the evidence and render a fair and just verdict in antitrust cases, ensuring the protection of competition and consumer welfare in the marketplace.