Oklahoma Jury Instruction — Assaulting A Federal Office— - Without Use Of A Deadly Weapon Oklahoma Jury Instruction — Assaulting A Federal Office— - Without Use Of A Deadly Weapon is a legal instruction given to a jury in the state of Oklahoma when a defendant is accused of assaulting a federal law enforcement officer without the use of a deadly weapon. This jury instruction provides guidance to the jurors on the elements of the offense, the burden of proof, and the relevant legal standards to consider during their deliberations. Assaulting a federal officer, without the use of a deadly weapon, refers to a criminal act where a defendant intentionally and unlawfully engages in physical contact with a federal law enforcement officer, such as an FBI agent, DEA officer, or a U.S. Marshal, but does not involve the use of a deadly weapon. This type of offense is taken very seriously due to its potential impact on the safety and effectiveness of federal law enforcement agencies. When a defendant is charged with assaulting a federal officer without the use of a deadly weapon, the prosecution has the burden to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant intentionally engaged in physical contact with the federal officer. These jury instructions will outline the elements which need to be proven, such as the identity of the victim as a federal officer and the absence of a deadly weapon during the assault. Although the specific types of Oklahoma Jury Instruction — Assaulting A Federal Office— - Without Use Of A Deadly Weapon may vary depending on the jurisdiction and the circumstances of the case, they generally address the essential elements of the offense and the applicable legal principles. Some of the key issues that may be covered in these instructions include: 1. Identification of the victim: The jury instruction may clarify the definition of a federal law enforcement officer and provide examples of agencies and personnel considered as such. 2. Intent: The instruction will explain that the defendant must have intentionally engaged in physical contact with the federal officer in question. Accidental contact or unintended actions may not qualify as assault. 3. Knowledge of federal officer status: The prosecution must demonstrate that the defendant knew or reasonably should have known that the victim was a federal officer acting in their official capacity. 4. Absence of a deadly weapon: This instruction will emphasize that the assault charge only applies when a deadly weapon was not involved. If a deadly weapon was used or threatened, different charges may apply, such as assault with a deadly weapon, which carries more severe penalties. It is important for the jury to carefully consider the evidence presented during the trial, witness testimonies, and any relevant legal instructions provided by the judge. Following these instructions, the jury will deliberate and reach a verdict based on their assessment of the facts presented during the trial. In conclusion, Oklahoma Jury Instruction — Assaulting A Federal Office— - Without Use Of A Deadly Weapon is a comprehensive set of legal guidelines provided to the jury in cases involving allegations of assault against a federal law enforcement officer without the use of a deadly weapon. By analyzing the elements of the offense and relevant legal standards, jurors can make an informed decision regarding the guilt or innocence of the defendant.