Oklahoma Jury Instruction — Modified Allen Charge is a legal directive provided by the court to a jury panel during a criminal trial or other legal proceedings, aiming to encourage juror consensus and prevent a hung jury. This instruction is also known as the "Modified Allen Charge" or "Allen Charge." The purpose of the Modified Allen Charge is to encourage jurors to deliberate further, reconsider their positions, and strive for unanimity when they initially fail to reach a unanimous verdict. It aims to address any disagreements that may have arisen among jurors and avoid a mistrial or deadlock. There are different types of Modified Allen Charges frequently used in Oklahoma courts: 1. Traditional Modified Allen Charge: In this type of instruction, the judge advises the jury that they should carefully listen to each other's arguments, openly discuss their views, and thoroughly examine the evidence presented during the trial. The judge also emphasizes that it is their duty to try to reach a unanimous decision. 2. Multiple Modified Allen Charge: If the jury fails to reach a unanimous verdict after receiving the initial Modified Allen Charge, the judge can use multiple iterations of modified instructions to further encourage discussion and consensus among jurors. 3. Alternatives to Modified Allen Charge: In certain cases, judges may opt for alternative instructions instead of a Modified Allen Charge. These alternative instructions could include the "Dynamite Charge" (threatening a mistrial and reassignment to a new jury panel), or the "Supplemental Charge" (requesting further clarification or emphasizing specific legal principles). It is important to note that the use and specific wording of the Modified Allen Charge may vary between jurisdictions and individual cases. Judges typically have discretion in determining whether the Modified Allen Charge is appropriate and necessary, based on the specific circumstances of the trial and the jury's apparent deadlock. Overall, the Oklahoma Jury Instruction — Modified Allen Charge serves as a tool to encourage jurors to reevaluate their positions and actively engage in deliberations to achieve a unanimous verdict, ensuring fairness and justice in the legal process.