Oklahoma Motion in Liming to Prevent Reference to Seat Belt Use is a legal maneuver used in court proceedings to restrict the introduction of evidence or testimony regarding the use or non-use of seat belts. This motion aims to prevent any reference to seat belt use as it may not directly relate to the issues being argued or may create a bias among the jury. Named types of Oklahoma Motion in Liming to Prevent Reference to Seat Belt Use: 1. General Motion in Liming: This type of motion seeks to exclude all references, evidence, or testimony related to seat belt use throughout the entire trial, regardless of the specific circumstances of the case. 2. Case-Specific Motion in Liming: This type of motion is tailored to a specific case and motion details are specific to that case only. It seeks to prevent any mentions of seat belt use within the scope of the case, where it may not be relevant or could potentially influence the jury's judgment. 3. Criminal Motion in Liming: This type of motion is filed in criminal cases to restrict any reference to the defendant's seat belt use in order to prevent the creation of a prejudicial image that could impact the jury's decision. 4. Civil Motion in Liming: Filed in civil cases, this type of motion aims to exclude any evidence or testimony related to seat belt use, as it can be seen as irrelevant to the determination of liability or damages. 5. Personal Injury Motion in Liming: This motion is commonly used in personal injury cases to prevent the introduction of seat belt use evidence, arguing that it could be misleading or distract the jury from focusing on the core issues surrounding the accident or injury. 6. Wrongful Death Motion in Liming: In wrongful death cases, this motion seeks to limit any discussions about seat belt use in order to maintain objectivity and prevent any potential negative bias towards the deceased, regardless of whether they were wearing a seat belt or not. Overall, Oklahoma Motion in Liming to Prevent Reference to Seat Belt Use is an essential legal strategy used to maintain fairness and objectivity during court proceedings, specifically safeguarding against the introduction of potentially prejudicial or irrelevant information related to seat belt use.