This is simply a short statement that states that, in the event of a conflict between the provisions of one Article and the terms and conditions contained in prior Articles provided for in the Agreement, the parties agree that the provisions of a designated Article shall prevail.
Oklahoma Conflict of Terms refers to a legal concept that arises when multiple provisions or clauses within a contract or legal document contradict each other, making it difficult to determine the parties' original intentions. This conflict typically occurs when the wording or language used in different sections of the document is inconsistent or conflicting. In Oklahoma, like in many other states, the rules for resolving a Conflict of Terms are governed by the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). The UCC provides a framework for interpreting and resolving discrepancies in contracts and other commercial transactions to ensure fairness and clarity. There are different types of Oklahoma Conflict of Terms that may arise in various legal contexts. Some key examples include: 1. Ambiguous Terms: These situations occur when a contract includes provisions or language that can be reasonably interpreted in more than one way. Ambiguities may arise if the wording is unclear, or if multiple interpretations are possible based on different perspectives. 2. Express Provisions vs. Course of Performance: This conflict arises when the express provisions stated in a contract contradict the actions or conduct of the parties during the performance of the agreement. For instance, if the contract explicitly states one condition, but the parties consistently perform in a manner that contradicts it, a Conflict of Terms may arise. 3. Conflicts between Different Documents: In some cases, multiple documents may be associated with a transaction, such as purchase orders, invoices, or delivery receipts. If these documents contain conflicting terms, discrepancies and ambiguities may arise, leading to a Conflict of Terms. 4. Conflicting Jurisdictional Provisions: When contracts involve parties from different states or countries, conflicts may arise due to varying laws and jurisdictional requirements. This Conflict of Terms is particularly relevant in cross-border transactions where the laws of different jurisdictions may interact, potentially leading to inconsistencies and contradictions. Resolving a Conflict of Terms in Oklahoma generally involves determining the parties' true intentions, considering the language of the conflicting terms, surrounding circumstances, and industry customs. Courts may also consider the course of dealing between the parties, trade practices, and usage of trade to aid in interpretation and resolution. Ultimately, the resolution of Oklahoma Conflict of Terms strives to uphold fairness, protect the reasonable expectations of the parties, and promote a consistent interpretation of contracts and legal documents.Oklahoma Conflict of Terms refers to a legal concept that arises when multiple provisions or clauses within a contract or legal document contradict each other, making it difficult to determine the parties' original intentions. This conflict typically occurs when the wording or language used in different sections of the document is inconsistent or conflicting. In Oklahoma, like in many other states, the rules for resolving a Conflict of Terms are governed by the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). The UCC provides a framework for interpreting and resolving discrepancies in contracts and other commercial transactions to ensure fairness and clarity. There are different types of Oklahoma Conflict of Terms that may arise in various legal contexts. Some key examples include: 1. Ambiguous Terms: These situations occur when a contract includes provisions or language that can be reasonably interpreted in more than one way. Ambiguities may arise if the wording is unclear, or if multiple interpretations are possible based on different perspectives. 2. Express Provisions vs. Course of Performance: This conflict arises when the express provisions stated in a contract contradict the actions or conduct of the parties during the performance of the agreement. For instance, if the contract explicitly states one condition, but the parties consistently perform in a manner that contradicts it, a Conflict of Terms may arise. 3. Conflicts between Different Documents: In some cases, multiple documents may be associated with a transaction, such as purchase orders, invoices, or delivery receipts. If these documents contain conflicting terms, discrepancies and ambiguities may arise, leading to a Conflict of Terms. 4. Conflicting Jurisdictional Provisions: When contracts involve parties from different states or countries, conflicts may arise due to varying laws and jurisdictional requirements. This Conflict of Terms is particularly relevant in cross-border transactions where the laws of different jurisdictions may interact, potentially leading to inconsistencies and contradictions. Resolving a Conflict of Terms in Oklahoma generally involves determining the parties' true intentions, considering the language of the conflicting terms, surrounding circumstances, and industry customs. Courts may also consider the course of dealing between the parties, trade practices, and usage of trade to aid in interpretation and resolution. Ultimately, the resolution of Oklahoma Conflict of Terms strives to uphold fairness, protect the reasonable expectations of the parties, and promote a consistent interpretation of contracts and legal documents.
