The Oklahoma Motion to Quash Deposition Subpoena Ducks Cecum is a legal document used to challenge or object to a deposition subpoena that seeks the production of documents, records, or other tangible items. This motion is filed with the court to request the judge's intervention in resolving any issues related to the subpoena, ultimately seeking to have it canceled or modified. Keywords: 1. Oklahoma: This refers to the specific jurisdiction where the motion is being filed, indicating that it falls under Oklahoma state law. 2. Motion to Quash: This legal term describes the action taken by a party to challenge or dispute the validity or enforceability of a subpoena. 3. Deposition Subpoena: A deposition subpoena is a legal document that compels a person to give sworn testimony outside a courtroom. In this context, it refers to a subpoena requesting a witness to appear for a deposition. 4. Ducks Cecum: Derived from Latin, this term means "bring with you." It signifies that the subpoena not only requires the witness's appearance but also the production of specific documents or materials. 5. Detailed Description: Refers to providing an in-depth explanation or account of the Oklahoma Motion to Quash Deposition Subpoena Ducks Cecum. Types of Oklahoma Motion to Quash Deposition Subpoena Ducks Cecum: 1. Substantive Motion to Quash: This type of motion argues the substantive legal reasons for why the deposition subpoena should be canceled or modified. It may allege privilege, irrelevance of documents, over breadth, or improperly issued subpoena, among other grounds. 2. Procedural Motion to Quash: This type of motion challenges the procedural aspects of the subpoena, such as improper service, a failure to comply with notice requirements, or other procedural defects that render the subpoena invalid. 3. Protective Motion to Quash: This type of motion seeks to protect the party or witness from undue burden, oppression, or harassment resulting from the deposition subpoena. It may ask the court to limit the scope, duration, or location of the deposition. It is important to note that while these are common types, the specific types of motions to quash may vary based on the unique circumstances of each case or jurisdiction.