This form contains sample jury instructions, to be used across the United States. These questions are to be used only as a model, and should be altered to more perfectly fit your own cause of action needs.
The Pennsylvania Jury Instruction — 1.1 Comparative Negligence Defense is a crucial aspect of personal injury law in Pennsylvania. This instruction outlines the principles and guidelines that the jury must consider when determining the allocation of fault between parties involved in a negligence case. Keywords: Pennsylvania, jury instruction, 1.1, comparative negligence defense, personal injury law, negligence case, fault allocation. The purpose of the Pennsylvania Jury Instruction — 1.1 Comparative Negligence Defense is to ensure a fair and equitable allocation of responsibility for an accident or injury. It allows the jury to assess the level of negligence exhibited by each party involved and determine the proportionate amount of liability each party bears. Keywords: fairness, equitable, responsibility, accident, injury, negligence, parties involved, liability. There are different types of Pennsylvania Jury Instruction — 1.1 Comparative Negligence Defense instructions based on variations in how comparative negligence is applied. Some commonly known types are: 1. Pure Comparative Negligence: Under this instruction, the jury evaluates the negligence of each party and assigns a percentage of fault to each of them, regardless of any threshold level. Even if a plaintiff is found to be mostly at fault, they may still recover damages, but the amount will be reduced proportionally based on their assigned percentage of fault. Keywords: pure comparative negligence, percentage of fault, recover damages, reduced proportionally. 2. Modified Comparative Negligence (50% Bar Rule): This instruction applies a threshold or bar rule limiting the plaintiff's recovery if they are found to be equally or more at fault than the defendant(s). If the plaintiff's percentage of fault is 51% or more, they will be barred from recovering any damages; however, if it is 50% or less, they can still recover damages, but the amount will be reduced according to their assigned percentage of fault. Keywords: modified comparative negligence, 50% bar rule, recovery, plaintiff's fault, defendant's fault, barred, damages reduced. 3. Modified Comparative Negligence (51% Bar Rule): Similar to the 50% bar rule, this instruction also applies a threshold rule for the plaintiff's recovery. However, to recover damages, the plaintiff's percentage of fault must be 50% or less, and if it is 51% or more, they will be barred from recovering any damages. Keywords: modified comparative negligence, 51% bar rule, recovery, plaintiff's fault, defendant's fault, barred, damages. It is essential for both plaintiffs and defendants to understand the different Pennsylvania Jury Instruction — 1.1 Comparative Negligence Defense instructions to present their case effectively and ensure a fair outcome in a negligence lawsuit. Keywords: plaintiffs, defendants, negligence lawsuit, fair outcome, effective case presentation.
The Pennsylvania Jury Instruction — 1.1 Comparative Negligence Defense is a crucial aspect of personal injury law in Pennsylvania. This instruction outlines the principles and guidelines that the jury must consider when determining the allocation of fault between parties involved in a negligence case. Keywords: Pennsylvania, jury instruction, 1.1, comparative negligence defense, personal injury law, negligence case, fault allocation. The purpose of the Pennsylvania Jury Instruction — 1.1 Comparative Negligence Defense is to ensure a fair and equitable allocation of responsibility for an accident or injury. It allows the jury to assess the level of negligence exhibited by each party involved and determine the proportionate amount of liability each party bears. Keywords: fairness, equitable, responsibility, accident, injury, negligence, parties involved, liability. There are different types of Pennsylvania Jury Instruction — 1.1 Comparative Negligence Defense instructions based on variations in how comparative negligence is applied. Some commonly known types are: 1. Pure Comparative Negligence: Under this instruction, the jury evaluates the negligence of each party and assigns a percentage of fault to each of them, regardless of any threshold level. Even if a plaintiff is found to be mostly at fault, they may still recover damages, but the amount will be reduced proportionally based on their assigned percentage of fault. Keywords: pure comparative negligence, percentage of fault, recover damages, reduced proportionally. 2. Modified Comparative Negligence (50% Bar Rule): This instruction applies a threshold or bar rule limiting the plaintiff's recovery if they are found to be equally or more at fault than the defendant(s). If the plaintiff's percentage of fault is 51% or more, they will be barred from recovering any damages; however, if it is 50% or less, they can still recover damages, but the amount will be reduced according to their assigned percentage of fault. Keywords: modified comparative negligence, 50% bar rule, recovery, plaintiff's fault, defendant's fault, barred, damages reduced. 3. Modified Comparative Negligence (51% Bar Rule): Similar to the 50% bar rule, this instruction also applies a threshold rule for the plaintiff's recovery. However, to recover damages, the plaintiff's percentage of fault must be 50% or less, and if it is 51% or more, they will be barred from recovering any damages. Keywords: modified comparative negligence, 51% bar rule, recovery, plaintiff's fault, defendant's fault, barred, damages. It is essential for both plaintiffs and defendants to understand the different Pennsylvania Jury Instruction — 1.1 Comparative Negligence Defense instructions to present their case effectively and ensure a fair outcome in a negligence lawsuit. Keywords: plaintiffs, defendants, negligence lawsuit, fair outcome, effective case presentation.