Pennsylvania Jury Instruction - 2.2 With Comparative Negligence Defense

• Category: Federal - Jury Instructions
• State: Multi-State
• Control #: US-11C-0-2-2
• Format: Word; Rich Text

Description

This form contains sample jury instructions, to be used across the United States. These questions are to be used only as a model, and should be altered to more perfectly fit your own cause of action needs. Pennsylvania Jury Instruction — 2.2 With Comparative Negligence Defense is a legal guideline provided to juries in Pennsylvania when determining liability in personal injury cases. Keywords: Pennsylvania, jury instruction, 2.2, comparative negligence defense, legal guideline, liability, personal injury cases. This specific jury instruction, 2.2, addresses cases where the defense argues that the plaintiff should bear some responsibility for the accident or injury. It introduces the concept of comparative negligence, which allows for the evaluation of the degree of fault held by both parties involved. Pennsylvania recognizes two types of comparative negligence jury instructions: 1. Modified Comparative Negligence: Under this instruction, the jury determines the percentage of fault assigned to each party. The plaintiff can only recover damages if their fault is less than or equal to the defendant's. If their assigned fault exceeds the defendant's, they are completely barred from recovery. 2. Pure Comparative Negligence: This instruction allows the plaintiff to recover damages even if their fault exceeds the defendant's. The awarded damages are reduced in proportion to their assigned portion of fault. The purpose of this instruction is to ensure fairness in determining liability by apportioning fault based on the actions or negligence of each party involved. It provides jurors with a framework to evaluate the evidence presented and make informed decisions on allocating responsibility. By using this specific jury instruction, the court seeks to promote consistency and fairness in personal injury cases throughout Pennsylvania. Jurors must carefully consider the evidence, assess the degree of negligence of each party, and deliver a verdict that reflects an equitable distribution of fault. In conclusion, The Pennsylvania Jury Instruction — 2.2 with Comparative Negligence Defense is a legal guideline that allows juries to determine responsibility and assign fault in personal injury cases. This instruction ensures a fair evaluation of the proportionate negligence of each party involved, ultimately leading to a more just outcome.

Pennsylvania Jury Instruction — 2.2 With Comparative Negligence Defense is a legal guideline provided to juries in Pennsylvania when determining liability in personal injury cases. Keywords: Pennsylvania, jury instruction, 2.2, comparative negligence defense, legal guideline, liability, personal injury cases. This specific jury instruction, 2.2, addresses cases where the defense argues that the plaintiff should bear some responsibility for the accident or injury. It introduces the concept of comparative negligence, which allows for the evaluation of the degree of fault held by both parties involved. Pennsylvania recognizes two types of comparative negligence jury instructions: 1. Modified Comparative Negligence: Under this instruction, the jury determines the percentage of fault assigned to each party. The plaintiff can only recover damages if their fault is less than or equal to the defendant's. If their assigned fault exceeds the defendant's, they are completely barred from recovery. 2. Pure Comparative Negligence: This instruction allows the plaintiff to recover damages even if their fault exceeds the defendant's. The awarded damages are reduced in proportion to their assigned portion of fault. The purpose of this instruction is to ensure fairness in determining liability by apportioning fault based on the actions or negligence of each party involved. It provides jurors with a framework to evaluate the evidence presented and make informed decisions on allocating responsibility. By using this specific jury instruction, the court seeks to promote consistency and fairness in personal injury cases throughout Pennsylvania. Jurors must carefully consider the evidence, assess the degree of negligence of each party, and deliver a verdict that reflects an equitable distribution of fault. In conclusion, The Pennsylvania Jury Instruction — 2.2 with Comparative Negligence Defense is a legal guideline that allows juries to determine responsibility and assign fault in personal injury cases. This instruction ensures a fair evaluation of the proportionate negligence of each party involved, ultimately leading to a more just outcome.