Pennsylvania Jury Instruction — 2.3 Consideration of the Evidence: Duty to Follow Instructions Governmental Entity or Agency Involved provides guidance to jurors regarding their duty to carefully evaluate and consider the evidence presented during a trial and to follow the instructions given by the court. This particular instruction focuses on cases involving a governmental entity or agency and emphasizes the importance of impartially weighing the evidence. In cases involving a governmental entity or agency, it is crucial for jurors to recognize the unique responsibilities and requirements tied to such entities. These instructions ensure that jurors understand their duty to remain objective and consider the evidence presented without any bias or preconceived notions. Failure to adhere to these instructions may result in unfair judgments or incorrect findings. Different types of Pennsylvania Jury Instruction — 2.3 Consideration of the Evidence: Duty to Follow Instructions Governmental Entity or Agency Involved may include: 1. Federal Government Cases: In cases involving the federal government as a party, these instructions guide jurors in evaluating the evidence presented, considering the role and responsibilities of the federal entity involved, and following the instructions to make an informed decision. 2. State Government Cases: This instruction becomes relevant in cases where a state government entity or agency is involved. Jurors must understand the particular circumstances and dynamics of state government involvement and apply the provided instructions accordingly. 3. Municipal Government Cases: In cases where a municipal government entity or agency is implicated, jurors must consider the evidence presented in light of the specific nature of municipal governance. These instructions remind jurors to evaluate the evidence objectively while taking into account any actions, policies, or responsibilities unique to the municipality involved. 4. Governmental Agency Involvement: This instruction covers cases in which a specific government agency, rather than an entire entity, is implicated. It outlines the jurors' duty to assess the evidence in relation to the agency's actions, policies, or mandates, ensuring a fair and unbiased evaluation. By providing clear guidance on the duty to consider the evidence and follow instructions, these jury instructions help maintain fairness, impartiality, and the integrity of the judicial system. Jurors play a crucial role in upholding justice by carefully weighing the evidence presented and making informed decisions based on the instructions provided.