Pennsylvania Jury Instruction Impeachmenten— - Inconsistent Statement and Felony Conviction — Defendant Testifies With Felony Conviction is a crucial legal concept that pertains to the credibility of a defendant who testifies during their trial, but has a prior felony conviction on record. This type of jury instruction aims to guide the jury in evaluating the defendant's testimony and determining how much weight it should be given in light of their criminal history. In Pennsylvania, there are different types of instructions related to this topic, which include: 1. Jury Instruction Impeachmenten— - Inconsistent Statement: This type of instruction addresses situations where the defendant has made contradictory statements either before or during the trial. It allows the jury to question the defendant's credibility if they find inconsistencies in their statements, as it raises doubts about their truthfulness. 2. Jury Instruction Impeachmenten— - Felony Conviction: This instruction focuses specifically on the effect of a prior felony conviction on the defendant's credibility. It highlights that a person with a felony conviction has a history of criminal behavior and, therefore, their testimony may be less trustworthy. However, it is essential to note that a felony conviction alone should not automatically render the defendant's testimony unreliable, as the jury must consider other factors as well. 3. Jury Instruction Impeachmenten— - Defendant Testifies With Felony Conviction: This instruction combines the concepts of inconsistent statements and felony convictions. It instructs the jury to scrutinize the defendant's testimony carefully, as they have both the past felony conviction and contradictory statements that could affect their credibility. The instruction reminds the jury to consider these factors alongside other evidence presented during the trial. Overall, these Pennsylvania jury instructions are designed to assist the jury in assessing the credibility of a defendant who testifies with a felony conviction and potential inconsistent statements. The goal is to ensure that the jury considers all relevant information when forming their decision and does not give undue weight to the defendant's testimony, especially considering their prior criminal history.