Pennsylvania Jury Instruction — Threats Against The President is a set of guidelines provided to jurors in criminal cases involving threats made against the President of the United States within the state of Pennsylvania. These instructions provide a clear framework for jurors to assess the facts and evidence presented in such cases. Keywords: Pennsylvania Jury Instruction, Threats Against The President, criminal cases, guidelines, jurors, facts, evidence. There are different types of Pennsylvania Jury Instruction — Threats Against The President; they include: 1. Elements of the Offense: This instruction outlines the essential elements required to establish a charge of making threats against the President. It includes elements such as the intent to threaten, the communication of the threat, and a connection to the President. 2. Men REA: This instruction focuses on the mental state of the offender. It explains that the prosecution must prove that the defendant had the specific intent to threaten the President, rather than a mere expression of political disagreement or dissatisfaction. 3. Communication: This instruction educates jurors on the various communication methods that can constitute a threat. It includes traditional forms such as spoken or written threats, as well as modern methods like email, social media platforms, or any other means of public or private communication. 4. True Threats Standard: This instruction elaborates on the concept of true threats. It explains that a true threat is a statement or communication that, when taken in context, would reasonably cause a person to fear for their safety or the safety of the President. 5. First Amendment Issues: This instruction addresses the delicate balance between freedom of speech and the prohibition of threats against the President. It informs jurors about the limitations imposed by the First Amendment's protection of free speech and emphasizes that not all offensive or distasteful expressions qualify as threats. 6. Reasonable Interpretation: This instruction guides jurors in determining whether a reasonable person would interpret the defendant's statement or communication as a genuine threat against the President. It encourages jurors to evaluate the context, surrounding circumstances, and the reaction of the intended audience. 7. Burden of Proof: This instruction reminds jurors of the prosecution's duty to prove the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. It emphasizes that before finding the defendant guilty, their guilt must be the only reasonable interpretation of the evidence presented. Pennsylvania Jury Instruction — Threats Against The President provides a comprehensive framework for jurors to assess cases involving threats made against the President within the state. It ensures that the decision-making process is fair, informed, and based on the relevant legal principles and standards.