Puerto Rico Jury Instruction — 2.2 With Comparative Negligence Defense is a legal guideline that provides instructions to the jury regarding the application of the comparative negligence defense in Puerto Rico. It is designed to help the jury understand how to distribute liability when more than one party is responsible for causing harm or damages in a civil lawsuit. This jury instruction assists the jurors in evaluating and attributing degrees of fault to each party involved in the case, considering their negligent acts or omissions. In Puerto Rico, comparative negligence is a legal principle that allows for the apportionment of damages based on the proportion of each party's fault. This means that even if the plaintiff is partially responsible for the harm suffered, they may still be eligible to receive compensation, which is reduced by their own level of negligence. The purpose of Puerto Rico Jury Instruction — 2.2 With Comparative Negligence Defense is to ensure that the jury can fairly assess the liability of each party involved and arrive at a just verdict. It provides a framework for the jurors to consider the evidence presented during the trial, assess the negligence of all parties, and determine the extent to which each party should be held responsible for the damages incurred. It is important to note that while Puerto Rico Jury Instruction — 2.2 With Comparative Negligence Defense generally applies to cases involving multiple parties and shared fault, there may be specific instructions tailored to different types of cases. For instance, specific instructions may exist for medical malpractice cases, automobile accidents, product liability, or premises liability cases. These variations would provide more specific guidelines and considerations relevant to the particular circumstances of each case. Overall, Puerto Rico Jury Instruction — 2.2 With Comparative Negligence Defense is an essential tool in ensuring a fair and equitable resolution in civil cases, promoting the principles of fairness and proportionality in the allocation of liability and damages. It allows juries to consider the comparative fault of all parties involved, leading to more accurate and just outcomes.