Puerto Rico Jury Instruction — 1.9.5.1 Corporation As Alter Ego Of Stockholder In Puerto Rico, the jury instruction 1.9.5.1 relates to the concept of a corporation being considered the alter ego of a stockholder. This type of instruction is commonly given in cases where the plaintiff seeks to pierce the corporate veil and hold the stockholder personally liable for the corporation's actions or debts. The purpose of this jury instruction is to guide the jury on the legal standards and principles involved in determining if a corporation should be treated as the alter ego of a stockholder. This instruction educates the jurors on the factors they should consider in evaluating whether the corporate form was used to perpetrate fraud, injustice, or circumvent the law. Some relevant keywords related to this jury instruction are: 1. Alter ego: This refers to the legal doctrine that allows a court to disregard the separate legal personality of a corporation and hold the stockholder personally liable for the corporation's obligations. 2. Piercing the corporate veil: This doctrine allows the court to set aside the protections of limited liability provided by the corporate structure and hold stockholders accountable for the corporation's actions or debts. 3. Personal liability: This pertains to the legal responsibility of an individual for their actions or debts. In the case of alter ego, it involves holding the stockholder personally responsible for the corporation's liabilities. Different types of Puerto Rico Jury Instruction — 1.9.5.1 Corporation As Alter Ego Of Stockholder may include variations based on the specific circumstances of each case. Some potential variations might include: 1. Element of control: The instruction may focus on the level of control exercised by the stockholder over the corporation's affairs. It may require the jury to determine if the stockholder dominates and disregards the corporate structure. 2. Fraudulent intent: The instruction may address the issue of fraudulent intent, requiring the jury to evaluate if the stockholder deliberately used the corporation as a shield to defraud or harm others. 3. Injustice or inequity: This variation may emphasize the requirement that the plaintiff must demonstrate that allowing the stockholder to hide behind the corporate entity would result in an unjust or inequitable outcome. It's important to note that the specific content and wording of the jury instruction will depend on the case at hand, the specific legal arguments presented, and the judge's discretion.