Rhode Island Jury Instruction - 7.2 Duty To Deliberate When Both Plaintiff and Defendant Claim Damages or When Damages Are Not an Issue

• Category: Federal - Jury Instructions - Basic Civil Claim Instructions
• State: Multi-State
• Control #: US-11CB-7-2
• Format: Word; Rich Text

Description

This form contains sample jury instructions, to be used across the United States. These questions are to be used only as a model, and should be altered to more perfectly fit your own cause of action needs. Rhode Island Jury Instruction 7.2, titled "Duty To Deliberate When Both Plaintiff and Defendant Claim Damages or When Damages Are Not an Issue," provides guidance to the jury on their duty to deliberate when both the plaintiff and defendant claim damages or when damages are not a disputed matter in a case. In cases where both the plaintiff and defendant claim damages, Jury Instruction 7.2 emphasizes the jurors' responsibility to carefully consider the evidence presented by both parties and assess the extent of damages claimed. Jurors should assess the credibility and weight of the evidence provided by each party and the arguments made by their respective attorneys. It reminds the jury that damages awarded should be fair and reasonable, based on the evidence presented, and not influenced by sympathy or prejudice. Additionally, when damages are not an issue, Jury Instruction 7.2 instructs the jurors to focus their deliberations on other aspects of the case. It prompts them to deliberate on liability, negligence, causation, or other relevant factors that may determine the outcome of the case. While damages may not be a contention, the jury must still deliberate thoroughly and reach a fair conclusion based on the facts presented. In summary, Rhode Island Jury Instruction 7.2 highlights the jurors' duty to deliberate when both plaintiff and defendant claim damages or when damages are not an issue. It calls on them to assess the evidence objectively, weigh arguments, and deliver a fair and reasonable verdict based on the facts and applicable law. Keywords: Rhode Island Jury Instruction, 7.2, Duty to Deliberate, Plaintiff, Defendant, Claim Damages, Damages Not an Issue.

Rhode Island Jury Instruction 7.2, titled "Duty To Deliberate When Both Plaintiff and Defendant Claim Damages or When Damages Are Not an Issue," provides guidance to the jury on their duty to deliberate when both the plaintiff and defendant claim damages or when damages are not a disputed matter in a case. In cases where both the plaintiff and defendant claim damages, Jury Instruction 7.2 emphasizes the jurors' responsibility to carefully consider the evidence presented by both parties and assess the extent of damages claimed. Jurors should assess the credibility and weight of the evidence provided by each party and the arguments made by their respective attorneys. It reminds the jury that damages awarded should be fair and reasonable, based on the evidence presented, and not influenced by sympathy or prejudice. Additionally, when damages are not an issue, Jury Instruction 7.2 instructs the jurors to focus their deliberations on other aspects of the case. It prompts them to deliberate on liability, negligence, causation, or other relevant factors that may determine the outcome of the case. While damages may not be a contention, the jury must still deliberate thoroughly and reach a fair conclusion based on the facts presented. In summary, Rhode Island Jury Instruction 7.2 highlights the jurors' duty to deliberate when both plaintiff and defendant claim damages or when damages are not an issue. It calls on them to assess the evidence objectively, weigh arguments, and deliver a fair and reasonable verdict based on the facts and applicable law. Keywords: Rhode Island Jury Instruction, 7.2, Duty to Deliberate, Plaintiff, Defendant, Claim Damages, Damages Not an Issue.