Keywords: South Carolina, Motion for Acquittal, Insanity, types Description: In South Carolina, a Motion for Acquittal Based on Insanity provides an opportunity for a defendant to argue that they should not be held criminally responsible for their actions due to a mental illness or insanity. This legal motion can be a crucial defense strategy in criminal cases where the defendant's mental capacity is in question. One type of South Carolina Motion for Acquittal Based on Insanity is the "M'Heighten Rule" defense. According to this standard, the defendant must prove that at the time of the offense, they did not understand the nature and quality of their actions or that they did not know what they were doing was wrong. Another type of Motion for Acquittal Based on Insanity is the "Irresistible Impulse" defense. Under this defense, the defendant argues that they had a mental condition that prevented them from controlling their actions, even though they may have been aware that their behavior was wrong. A third type is the "Volitional Incapacity" defense. This defense asserts that the defendant, due to a mental illness, lacked the capacity to conform their conduct to the requirements of the law, even if they understood the nature of their actions and knew they were wrong. To succeed with a Motion for Acquittal Based on Insanity in South Carolina, the defendant must prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that their mental state at the time of the offense meets the criteria outlined in one of these defenses. Expert testimony from mental health professionals, medical records, and psychological evaluations are often used to support this defense strategy. It is important to note that even if a defendant is successful in their Motion for Acquittal Based on Insanity, they may not be released from custody. Instead, they may be committed to a mental health institution until they are deemed no longer a danger to themselves or others. In conclusion, a South Carolina Motion for Acquittal Based on Insanity is a legal strategy used to argue that a defendant should not be held criminally responsible for their actions due to mental illness or insanity. The M'Heighten Rule, Irresistible Impulse, and Volitional Incapacity are different types of defenses that can be employed to pursue this motion.