In deciding whether to set aside a judgment of dismissal for failure of a party to appear, courts seek to balance two competing interests: (1) the need to promote judicial economy; and (2) the need to preserve an individual's right to have his day in court. Therefore, in addition to the requirement that plaintiff show that the judgment was entered through excusable neglect or another statutory ground, the court will consider a variety of factors, including:
- the nature and extent of the prejudice which may be suffered by the non-defaulting party if the judgment is set aside;
- the presence of material issues of fact;
- the presence of a meritorious claim;
- the significance of the interests at stake, including, but not limited to, the amount of money involved;
- whether the failure to appear was intentional or willful or the result of conscious indifference;
- whether party or counsel bears responsibility for default; and
- the availability of less drastic sanctions.
