South Carolina Jury Instruction — 2.2 With Comparative Negligence Defense is a legal guideline given to the jury by the court in cases involving comparative negligence. This instruction provides a framework for analyzing and apportioning fault when multiple parties contribute to an injury or loss. In South Carolina, comparative negligence is a legal doctrine that allows the jury to assign a percentage of fault to each party involved in a lawsuit. The purpose of this instruction is to guide the jury in determining the degree of negligence attributable to each party and subsequently adjusting the damages accordingly. There are different types of South Carolina Jury Instruction — 2.2 With Comparative Negligence Defense, including: 1. Simple Comparative Negligence Instruction: This instruction advises the jury to allocate fault based on each party's contribution to the injury or loss. For example, if the plaintiff is found to be 30% at fault and the defendant 70% at fault, the court will adjust the total damages awarded to the plaintiff by reducing it by 30%. 2. Modified Comparative Negligence Instruction: This instruction follows the modified approach to comparative negligence, where the plaintiff may only recover damages if their fault is less than the defendant's. If the plaintiff's fault reaches or exceeds the defendant's percentage, they are barred from recovering any damages. This instruction is often used in instances where the plaintiff's negligence clearly surpasses the defendant's. 3. Joint and Several Liability instructions: In cases involving multiple defendants, this instruction clarifies that each defendant can be held individually liable for the entire amount of damages if they are found to be partially at fault. However, the court may limit the amount of damages recoverable from each defendant to their proportional share of fault. It is important for the jury to carefully consider the evidence presented and apply the appropriate South Carolina Jury Instruction — 2.2 With Comparative Negligence Defense to fairly determine the allocation of fault. By doing so, the jury ensures that each party takes responsibility for their actions, and the resulting verdict is just and equitable under the law.