South Carolina Jury Instruction — 1.5.1 Americans With Disabilities Act 42 USC Sect. 12101 – 12117 Disparate Treatment Claim is an essential legal guideline used in cases involving alleged discrimination based on disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). This jury instruction aims to inform jurors about the key elements and legal standards involved in evaluating a disparate treatment claim related to disability discrimination. Keywords: South Carolina Jury Instruction, Americans With Disabilities Act, 42 USC Sect. 12101-12117, Disparate Treatment Claim, disability discrimination. The South Carolina Jury Instruction — 1.5.1 addresses the concept of disparate treatment, which refers to instances where an individual with a disability is treated less favorably or discriminated against by an employer or entity covered by the ADA based on their disability. The instruction provides guidance to the jury on evaluating whether the plaintiff (the individual alleging discrimination) has established a prima facie case for disparate treatment under the ADA. The instruction begins by outlining the relevant provisions of the ADA, emphasizing the Act's purpose to eliminate discrimination against individuals with disabilities. It explains that the ADA prohibits discrimination in various areas, including employment, public accommodations, and services provided by state and local governments. The jury instruction then moves on to clarify the elements necessary to establish a disparate treatment claim under the ADA. These elements may include: 1. Disability: The instruction defines what qualifies as a disability under the ADA, highlighting that it includes physical or mental impairments that substantially limit one or more major life activities, a record of such impairment, or being regarded as having such an impairment. 2. Adverse Action or Different Treatment: The instruction explains that the plaintiff must demonstrate that they were subjected to adverse employment actions or treated differently than others similarly situated due to their disability. 3. Intent: The instruction emphasizes that the plaintiff must provide evidence that the defendant intended to discriminate against them based on their disability. This can be shown through direct evidence of discriminatory intent or through circumstantial evidence that suggests discriminatory motive. 4. Causation: The instruction reminds the jury that the plaintiff needs to establish a link between the adverse action or different treatment and their disability, showing that the disability was a motivating factor in the defendant's decision. The South Carolina Jury Instruction — 1.5.1 Americans With Disabilities Act 42 USC Sect. 12101 – 12117 Disparate Treatment Claim provides a comprehensive framework for jurors to evaluate disability discrimination claims under the ADA. It helps them understand the legal requirements and key factors involved in determining whether a disparate treatment claim is valid. By using clear and concise language, this instruction assists the jury in reaching an informed and fair decision regarding disability discrimination cases. Types of South Carolina Jury Instruction — 1.5.1 Americans With Disabilities Act 42 USC Sect. 12101 – 12117 Disparate Treatment Claim instructions may vary depending on the specific circumstances of the case, such as whether the claim arises in the context of employment, public accommodations, or government services. However, the core principles and legal standards discussed above generally apply to all disparate treatment claims under the ADA.