South Carolina Jury Instruction — 4.4.1 Rule 10(b— - 5(a) Device, Scheme Or Artifice To Defraud Insider Trading refers to a specific legal instruction provided to juries in South Carolina regarding cases involving insider trading and fraud. This instruction is intended to guide jurors on how to interpret and apply the relevant laws and regulations when determining guilt or innocence in such cases. Insider trading refers to the illegal practice of trading stocks or other securities based on non-public, material information about a company. It involves individuals with access to confidential information using that information for personal gain, which undermines the fairness and integrity of the financial markets. The South Carolina Jury Instruction 4.4.1 Rule 10(b) — 5(a) focuses on two main elements: the device, scheme, or artifice to defraud and insider trading. The instruction provides jurors with guidance on understanding these elements and how they relate to the specific case at hand. Keywords: South Carolina, jury instruction, Rule 10(b), 5(a), device, scheme, artifice, defraud, insider trading. Different types or variations of South Carolina Jury Instruction — 4.4.1 Rule 10(b— - 5(a) Device, Scheme Or Artifice To Defraud Insider Trading may include: 1. Device to Defraud Insider Trading: This aspect of the instruction focuses on the specific methods or devices used in fraudulent activities related to insider trading. It helps jurors understand how individuals employ deceptive techniques to gain an unfair advantage in securities trading. 2. Scheme to Defraud Insider Trading: This variation of the instruction emphasizes the broader schemes or plans devised by individuals to exploit insider information for personal gain. Jurors are instructed to examine the overall intent and design behind such schemes, which can involve multiple parties and complex transactions. 3. Artifice to Defraud Insider Trading: This component highlights the deceptive or fraudulent measures employed by individuals engaged in insider trading. It may encompass various tactics like falsifying records, misleading statements, or other fraudulent activities aimed at manipulating the securities market with inside information. Each of these variations provides specific guidance to juries about different aspects of insider trading cases, aiming to ensure a comprehensive understanding of the potential fraudulent activities and their impact on the financial markets.