South Carolina Motion to Quash Deposition Subpoena Duces Tecum

• Category: Civil Procedure - Motions - Samples
• State: Multi-State
• Control #: US-PI-0042
• Format: Word; Rich Text

Description

This form is a sample motion used in an attempt to quash a deposition subpoena duces tecum. A South Carolina Motion to Quash Deposition Subpoena Ducks Cecum is a legal document used to challenge or oppose a subpoena that requires the production of documents during a deposition. This motion aims to prevent the subpoenaed party from being compelled to produce certain documents, either due to lack of relevance, privilege, burden, or other legal grounds. The motion argues that the subpoenaed party should be excused from producing the requested documents and seeks to have the subpoena quashed. Keywords: South Carolina, Motion to Quash, Deposition Subpoena Ducks Cecum, legal document, challenge, oppose, subpoena, production of documents, deposition, prevent, compelled, lack of relevance, privilege, burden, legal grounds, excused, quashed. Different types of South Carolina Motions to Quash Deposition Subpoena Ducks Cecum might include: 1. Lack of Relevance: This type of motion argues that the requested documents are not relevant to the matter at hand. It seeks to demonstrate that the subpoenaed party should not be required to produce documents that do not bear direct relevance to the case. 2. Privilege: This motion asserts that the requested documents are protected by privilege, such as attorney-client privilege or doctor-patient privilege. It argues that the subpoenaed party should not be compelled to disclose privileged information during the deposition. 3. Undue Burden: This type of motion contends that complying with the subpoena would impose an undue burden on the subpoenaed party. It may argue that the production of documents would be excessively time-consuming, costly, or impractical. 4. Over broad or Vague: This motion challenges the subpoena for being overly broad or vague in its scope. It argues that the requested documents should be more narrowly tailored to ensure they are specific and relevant to the case. 5. Failure to Follow Proper Procedure: This type of motion asserts that the subpoenaing party failed to follow the proper procedure when serving the subpoena or failed to give the required notice. It argues that the subpoena is therefore invalid and should be quashed. 6. Lack of Good Faith: This motion claims that the subpoenaing party is acting in bad faith, such as using the subpoena for harassment purposes or to obtain confidential or non-discoverable information. It argues that such a subpoena should not be enforced. Overall, a South Carolina Motion to Quash Deposition Subpoena Ducks Cecum is a legal tool that allows parties to challenge the production of certain documents during a deposition, seeking to have the subpoena withdrawn or modified based on various legal grounds.

A South Carolina Motion to Quash Deposition Subpoena Ducks Cecum is a legal document used to challenge or oppose a subpoena that requires the production of documents during a deposition. This motion aims to prevent the subpoenaed party from being compelled to produce certain documents, either due to lack of relevance, privilege, burden, or other legal grounds. The motion argues that the subpoenaed party should be excused from producing the requested documents and seeks to have the subpoena quashed. Keywords: South Carolina, Motion to Quash, Deposition Subpoena Ducks Cecum, legal document, challenge, oppose, subpoena, production of documents, deposition, prevent, compelled, lack of relevance, privilege, burden, legal grounds, excused, quashed. Different types of South Carolina Motions to Quash Deposition Subpoena Ducks Cecum might include: 1. Lack of Relevance: This type of motion argues that the requested documents are not relevant to the matter at hand. It seeks to demonstrate that the subpoenaed party should not be required to produce documents that do not bear direct relevance to the case. 2. Privilege: This motion asserts that the requested documents are protected by privilege, such as attorney-client privilege or doctor-patient privilege. It argues that the subpoenaed party should not be compelled to disclose privileged information during the deposition. 3. Undue Burden: This type of motion contends that complying with the subpoena would impose an undue burden on the subpoenaed party. It may argue that the production of documents would be excessively time-consuming, costly, or impractical. 4. Over broad or Vague: This motion challenges the subpoena for being overly broad or vague in its scope. It argues that the requested documents should be more narrowly tailored to ensure they are specific and relevant to the case. 5. Failure to Follow Proper Procedure: This type of motion asserts that the subpoenaing party failed to follow the proper procedure when serving the subpoena or failed to give the required notice. It argues that the subpoena is therefore invalid and should be quashed. 6. Lack of Good Faith: This motion claims that the subpoenaing party is acting in bad faith, such as using the subpoena for harassment purposes or to obtain confidential or non-discoverable information. It argues that such a subpoena should not be enforced. Overall, a South Carolina Motion to Quash Deposition Subpoena Ducks Cecum is a legal tool that allows parties to challenge the production of certain documents during a deposition, seeking to have the subpoena withdrawn or modified based on various legal grounds.