In South Carolina, a Motion for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict or in the Alternative, for a New Trial is a legal action that seeks to challenge a jury's verdict or request for a new trial. This motion can be filed by either the plaintiff or the defendant in a civil case, or the prosecution or the defense in a criminal case. It provides a legal avenue to address potential errors or defects that may have affected the outcome of the trial. A Motion for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict challenges the sufficiency of the evidence presented during the trial. It argues that the jury's verdict was unsupported by the facts or that the legal standard required for a favorable verdict was not met. In essence, this motion asserts that no reasonable jury would have reached the same conclusion based on the evidence presented. On the other hand, a Motion for a New Trial asks the court to set aside the existing verdict and order a new trial. This motion is typically filed when there are grounds for believing that errors or irregularities occurred during the trial process that unfairly influenced the outcome. Some common grounds for a new trial include procedural errors, misconduct by the jury or opposing counsel, newly discovered evidence, or significant errors in the application of the law. To successfully file a Motion for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict or in the Alternative, for a New Trial, it is advisable to gather strong evidence, thoroughly review the trial proceedings, and consult with an experienced attorney. This motion should be supported by legal arguments, case laws, and relevant statutes to establish the presence of errors or defects in the trial process. In summary, the Motion for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict or in the Alternative, for a New Trial enables parties to challenge a jury's verdict or request a fresh trial in South Carolina. By addressing potential errors or irregularities, this motion plays a crucial role in ensuring fair and just outcomes in legal proceedings.